ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE DID NOT HAVE PROPER AUTHORITY TO ACT ON BEHALF OF CENTRAL MFG. CO AND STEALTH INDUSTRIES INC.
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER HAS ALWAYS CONTENTED THAT ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY RICHARD M. FOGEL DID NOT HAVE
PROPER AUTHORITY TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANIES THAT STOLLER RAN, CENTRAL MFG CO., AND STEALTH INDUSTRIES, INC., despite the fact that Judge Jack Schmetterer issued an order at the Trustee's request granting the Fogel the authority. For over a year in pleading after pleading Stoller asserted before Illinois Northern District Judge Jack B. Schmetterer that Fogel motion_to_Disqualify_Trusl.pdf was engaged in a "scheme" to defraud the bankruptcy court by entering into what amounted to a series of "sweet heart" deals with companies like Google Inc., and Pure Fishing Inc. In fact Fogel agreed to accept a $950,000.00 judgment in the Pure Fishing Case stating that it was "reasonable" and Fogel did not even bother to contest even one dollar of an attorney fee award for over $600,000.00 stating that all of those fees were reasonable. Never in the history of any court has any attorney ever accepted a fee award without any objection to any of the $600,000.00 attorney fees. In view of the fact that Attorneys normally can ever agree on fee awards of even $10,000 being fully proper, let alone $600,000.00. On April 2, 2008 the Seven Circuit granted Google_Opinion.pdf Stoller's appeal Stolle_Brief_Google_Appeal.pdf and struck down one of Fogel fraudulent settlement agreements with Google Inc. See Google's failed Response brief Googles_Response_Brief.pdfthat the Seventh Circuit did not buy. Stoller has thus asserted that the decision of the Seventh Circuit stands to support the fact that "every" settlement agreement that Fogel entered into should now be set aside. Last time the parties were in court before Judge Schmetterer Fogel said, "Just because Stoller can type a Notice of Appeal does not mean that Stoller can actually write an appealAppeal_brief_06-06950_8-21.pdf Appeal_Brief_Case_No._06-0.pdf Appeal_Brief_filed_8-20-07.pdf. http://search.access.gpo.gov/supreme-court/SearchRight.asp?ct=Supreme-Court-Dockets&q1=stoller&x=21&y=26 Stoller has now also referred Fogel and Google Inc.'s Lawyer Michael Zeller Michael_T._Zeller_Attornet.pdf back to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ . Stoller an attorney ethics expert now believes that he has the necessary evidence to have Fogel and Zeller charged with professional misconduct and fraud. In another matter involving governmental corruption Jon Dudas and Harry Moatz have been charged with corruption for their failure to prosecute an attorney disciplinary complaint OED_Attorney_Fraud_Complan.pdf against Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman "respondents". The Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) complaint contained prima facie and irrefuteable evidence 05_29_07_-_Leo_Stoller.pdf 07_24_07_-_Leo_Stoller.pdf 08_07_07_Transcript.pdfof the respondence "fraud" on the Patent Office. By Dudas and Moatz doing "nothing" was evidence that that they were conplicit. There was a story out of Washington last week that both Dudas and Moatz will be terminated. Does anyone know if Dudas and Moatz have been fired yet? Please email ldms4@hotmail.com
