STOLLER TO CANCEL THE GOOGLE TRADEMARK
CHICAGO--LAST MARCH 07 were dark days for Stoller. GOOGLE INC., held a procedural advantage over
Stoller working in conjunction with what Stoller has always alleged was an absolutely corrupt Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Appeal_Brief_Case_No._06-0.pdf by the name of Richard M. Fogel motion_to_Disqualify_Trusl.pdf. Google Inc. BROUGHT a frivolous Civil Rico lawsuit against two companies that Stoller was the president of because Stoller had petitioned to cancel the Google Inc., generic trademark. The mark Google has been in the dictionary http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/googlefor the goods listed under its registration and has become generic and or descriptive of the goods and/or services listed in its registrations. Google response to a petition to cancel was to file a frivilious civil Rico action against companies that Stoller ran. However, when it came time to sue, Google Inc., did not want to have to deal with Stoller so they "cut" a deal with Richard M. Fogel an Illinois Bankruptcy trustee to enter into a sham "agreement" accepting the Rico default judgment on behalf of the corporations, but excluding Stoller. A "sweet heart" fraudulent deal to allow Google Inc. to obtain what amounted a "default". The frivilious civil Rico lawsuit was nothing more than a "con" on the court devised by Michael T. Zeller, Google"s high priced "Pettifogger" and Richard M. Fogel. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals saw through Fogel and Zeller's "scheme" to defraud the bankruptcy court, Stoller and the District Court. The Appeals court Google_Opinion.pdf said, "Google and the trustee have both taken litigation positions, that appear to us internally inconsistent." Now the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board must reinstate Stoller Petition to Cancel Proceeding because Google "sham" agreement with the Bankruptcy has been held invalid. NOW GOOGLE'S GENERIC TERM MUST BE CANCLED BY THE TTAB AS A MATTER OF LAW. The Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ will revisit Stoller previously filed attorney disciplinary complaints Michael_T._Zeller_Attornet.pdf filed against Michael T. Zeller and Richard M. Fogel will be heard with the support of the Appellate Court's decision. Stoller an expert on attorney disciplinary complaints predicts that Zeller and Fogel can now be sanctioned or disbarred because of their gross professional misconduct according to papers filed by Stoller with the ARDC.
