Saturday, September 29, 2007
Friday, September 28, 2007
GOOGLE INC FILED "FRIVILIOUS" MOTION TO DISMISS STOLLER'S APPEAL
Thursday, September 27, 2007
ARDC FILED MOTION TO SEAL THE RECORD STOLLER REQUEST THAT THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT FIND RULE 766(a)(1) UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
SPRINT NEXTEL CORP WINS $69.5 Million FROM VONAGE
CHICAGO--SPRINT NEXTEL CORP won a $69.5 million dollar judgment from Vonage Holdings Corp in a Patent Infringement Lawsuit. This is the second lost for Vonage in that Verizon Communications Inc., won a $66 million dollar infringement suit against Vonage earlier this year.
Besides the damages, Vonage must pay Sprint a 5 percent royalty on future revenue. Vonage, which first sold shares to the public in May 2006, has never reported a profit. The company has $248.2 million in debt due in 2010. The company reported a net loss of $286.1 million in 2006. Leo Stoller is a trademark expert, trademark valuations, trademark licensing, brief writing ldms4@hotmail.com
Thursday, September 20, 2007
SOFWARE LICENSER FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY
CHICAGO--SCO GROUP INC., filed for bankruptcy afte it failed to convince a federal judge that it owned copyrights to the UNIX operating system. SCO has sued "free" software providers over open codes. In keeping with recent trends in the courts against the owners of intellectual property who attempt to aggressively police their property in the federal courts, district court judges have taken umbrage with companies who attempt to enforce their intellectual property rights. This has become known as the "unfairness doctrine". The trend started with the Black Berry decision where RIM agreed to pay more than $600 million to settle the much-discussed Blackberry patent infringement case. The RIM case set off alarms and now district courts are like pit bulls in favor of larger firms that are being attacked by smaller "rights holders". SCO GROUP Inc is merely the latest victim of the judicial prejudice being leveled against "small" firms that hold the intellectual property rights that "larger" firms choose to infringe. These "larger" firms can still be defeated, but the rights holders must pick their targets more carefully. Leo Stoller is a trademark expert ldms4@hotmail.com
ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL AND JANICE A. ALWIN FILED ANOTHER "FRIVILIOUS" PLEADING
CHICAGO--ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL AND HIS ASSISTANT JANICE A. ALWIN from the Chicago law firm of Shaw Gussis http://www.shawgussis.com/ HAVE FILED ANOTHER 'FRIVOLOUS' PLEADING IN THEIR CONTINUE PROGRAM TO HARASS AND MALICIOUS INJURY STOLLER AND OTHER MEMBERS OF HIS FAMILY according to charges made in a ARDC www.iardc.org/ Trustee Richard M. Fogel and Janice A. Alwin are listed by the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics as "not recommended" as well as the Chicago Firm of Shaw Gussis. Stoller has charged Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel with conduction a "fraudulent" bankruptcy estate auction and assigning to Lance G. Johnson http://www.roylance.com/ trademarks with a "license" in gross and/or "naked" license. Notwithstanding the charges of professional misconduct pending against Fogel and Johnson, Fogel according to charges of Stoller continues to engage in "professional" misconduct according to his complaint.
DISCLAIMER: According to the law, Fogel, Alwin and Johnson are presumed Innocent of any charges of professional misconduct until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT DISPARS 5 ATTORNEYS AND SUPPENDS 25
Chicago--THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS REPORTS TODAY THAT THE ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION (ARDC) www.iardc.com of the Illinois Supreme Court has dis bared 5 Illinois attorneys and has suspended 25 other Illinois Attorneys. John Flynn Rooney from the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin has written a complete story in the Wed Sept 19, 2007 edition regarding all of the names of the disbarred attorneys, Della Rose, Michael J Krawitz, Michael J. Hirshchtick, Ralph E. Williams and Paul M. Misch. Stoller has filed attorney disciplinary complaints against Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel http://www.shawgussis.com , David Abrams, Alfred Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ charging them with professional misconduct. Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of AEAE, a Chicago attorney ethics "watch dog" group for over 25 years and is the national spokesman for the "strict enforcement of attorney ethics".
DISCLAIMER. According to the law, Fogel, Johnson, Abrams and Goodman are considered Innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
AEAE DOES NOT RECOMEND LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS OR ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL
advocated and promoted the rigorous adherence to t he Rules of Professional Conduct http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html and the Rules of Judicial Ethics http://www.iardc.org/rulesjudcode.html. AEAE invites parties who have had attorney disciplinary problems with lawyers to notify the appropriate disciplinary commission click http://www.abanet.org/cpr/regulation/scpd/disciplinary.html ldms4@hotmail.com AEAE maintains a list of attorneys and judges who are not recommended by AEAE. Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ and Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel, Janice A. Alwin http://www.shawgusiss.com/ are names that appear on that list.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The fact that AEAE does not recomend an attorney does not mean that they are attorneys that are unfit to practice law, only that AEAE would not hire those lawyers. Before hiring an attorney a person should check with as many sources as possible.
Other sources may find the said attorneys as "highly" recomended.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
LANCE G. JOHNSON AND ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL UNLAWFUL CONTROL OVER STOLLER'S TRADEMARKS AND ASSETS HAS COME TO AN END
CHICAGO--LANCE G. JOHNSON ESQ. http://www.roylance.com/ and ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL http://www.shawgusiss.com/ unlawful control over Stoller assets, trademarks and companies has come to an end. Fogel according to charges of Stoller contrived a "phony" auction of Stoller's estate on August 7, 2007 when Fogel did not even permit the highest bidder to make a bid on the said estate in order to "fix" and/or "rig" the bidding so that his friend Lance G. Johnson could attempt to acquire Stoller's trademarks through a "assignment in gross" according to charges by Stoller. With the "sham" sale of Stoller's assets to Johnson, Fogel no longer has any jurisdiction over Stoller's assets and Lance G. Johnson's "phony" Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse has no valid rights that were ever acquired through Fogel "naked" trademark assignment.
RECOMENDED READING: The weather is starting to get a little cooler here in Chicago, Illinois. A good week end read would be the attorney disciplinary complaint that Stoller filed with the Patent and Trademark Office of Enrollment and Disciplinary Commission. The complaint is about 200 pages and it clearly outlines Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman's "scheme" to defraud the Patent and Trademark Office according to Stoller's charges. Click on the link below. Please be patient it will take about 4 minutes to load, but its worth waiting for.
Stoller's Office of Enrollment and Disciplinary complaint and transcripts of the July 24 and August 7, 2007 hearings click here it will take a few minutes to load the 300 pages:
http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91156858&pty=OPP&eno=129
STOLLER APPEALS TTAB DECISION TO THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
WASHINGTON--THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD DENIED STOLLER'S MOTION TO intervene in Opposition 91156858 Central Mfg Co. v. Dream Works LLC. The denial give Stoller the opportunity to go directly to the Federal Circuit of Appeals in Washington D.C. http://www.fedcir.gov/ This gives Stoller an opportunity to "spread" of record his allegations of "fraud" against Lance G. Johnson http://www.roylance.com/ and Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel http://www.shawgusiss.com/ before yet another Appeals Court.
The question now is what how will the Justices of the Federal Circuit rule after reading Stoller's disciplinary complaint against Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman?
Stoller's Office of Enrollment and Disciplinary complaint and transcripts of the July 24 and August 7, 2007 hearings click here it will take a few minutes to load the 300 pages:http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91156858&pty=OPP&eno=129

