ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL ADMITS THAT PATRICK A. CLISHAM FILED PLEADINGS BEFORE HE FILE HIS APPEARENCE
Saturday, June 30, 2007
ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL ADMITS THAT PATRICK A. CLISHAM FILED PLEADINGS BEFORE HE FILE HIS APPEARENCE
CHICAGO--IN A HEARING ON FRIDAY BEFORE JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Northern District of Illinois Case No. 05-B-64075 during cross examination by Stoller, Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel admitted that one of his Firms attorneys Patrick A. Clisham from Shaw Gussis Fishman Giance http://www.shawgussis.com/ filed numerous pleadings before MR. Clisham filed his appearence. Northern District of Illinois Rule LR83.16(c) States that Appearance by Firms Prohibited. Rule (d) States that an attorney appearance from "shall be file it prior to or simultaneously iwth the filing of any motion..." Courts have held that failure to file an appearance deprives the court of jurisdiction. Stoller argued that Judge Schmetterer lacked jurisdiction to enter all of his orders in Case No. 05-B-64075 during the months of May and June of 07. Stoller moved to vacate all of Judge Schmetterer's orders. Final arguments will be made on Monday in the Go Daddy Software trial. This Story continues:
Friday, June 29, 2007
GO DADDY TRIAL FRIDAY TODAY
CHICAGO--JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER ORDER THAT THE GO DADDY SOFTWARE TRIAL PROCEED TODAY. JUDGE SCHMETTERER IS ATTEMPTING TO LEARN THE VALUE of a Notice of Opposition proceeding to a bankruptcy estate in Case Number 05-B 64075 in the Northern District of Illinois. Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel has attempted to withdraw the Notice of Opposition in exchange for Go Daddy Software withdrawing what Stoller has alleged is a "false" Bankruptcy claim based upon the "legal" fees that Go Daddy has incurred in the Opposition. Stoller has argued that since the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has not the authority to award fees to the "loser" in an Opposition. Go Daddy has "no" valid claim in a bankruptcy based upon attorney fees incurred in an Opposition proceeding. Illinois Trustee Richard M. Fogel has "admitted" on the stand that he knows nothing about trademarks, oppositions and petition to cancel proceedings does "not" comprehend that the Go Daddy has no vaild claim against the said estate based upon attorney fees incurred by them in an opposition. Fogel who has been a bankruptcy Trustee he claims for 26 years, insists that Go Daddy Software has a valid claim against the Estate based upon Go Daddy's claim for attorney fees obtained in an opposition. There are also many British tourist that come to American according to sources close to Fogel, who insists that Americans are driving down the "wrong" side of the street. There are unconfirmed reports that state that the last time Richard M. Fogel was in England he claimed that the British were driving down the "wrong" side of their streets. This Story continues:http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/friday-judge-jack-b-schmetterer-orders.html
Thursday, June 28, 2007
JUDGE WILLIAM J. HIBBLER RULES THAT STOLLER'S APPEALS CAN PROCEED
CHICAGO--NORTHERN ILLINOIS DISTRICT JUDGE WILLIAM J. HIBBLER CASE NO. 06-C 6950 stated on June 20, 2007 Order giving Stoller the right to appeal three decisions of Bankruptcy Judge Jack B. Schmetterer: "upon review-the order approving the agreement with Google Inc., to Modify Stay and Compromise Certain Claims of Debtor's Wholly-owned corporations; authorizing compromise with Lanard Toys, Ltd and Lanard Toys Inc., and the order denying debtor's request to disqualify Richard M. Fogel as Trustee-are final orders. Therefore, this Court holds that these orders are final and appealable. Stoller is instructed to fully comply with the Bankruptcy Rules regarding the appellate procedures to the District Court." This story continues:
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
FRIDAY JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER ORDERS GO DADDY HEARING
CHICAGO--ON JUNE 22, 2007, last Friday Judge Jack B. Schmetterer in the Northern District of Illinois held a hearing on the value of the "Go Daddy Software Inc., Opposition involving the Go Daddy Federal Trademark Application for the Mark STEALTHRAY. Although Leo Stoller was ill, Judge Jack B. Schmetterer Ordered the Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel to put on his case. Leo Stoller was allowed to cross examine witnesses. Fogel took the stand and admitted that he never prosecuted a Trademark Opposition, Petition to Cancel Proceeding, Trademark Infringement case and did not even know what the TMEP was (Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure). It was apparent from Mr. Fogel's testimony on the stand that Fogel knows "nothing" about trademarks, the value of trademarks and the value of the Go Daddy trademark Opposition to the estate of Leo Stoller. This Friday, Stoller will put on his case and establish that the Go Daddy Opposition is an extremely valuable asset of the estate of Leo Stoller. Valued in excess of $5,000,000 (5 million dollars). Stoller has asserted that Mr. Trustee Fogel knows nothing about trademarks but a great deal about "picking the bones of disadvantaged pro se debtors" and taking proceedural advantage of them in bankruptcy proceedings by depriving them of their due process and equal protection rights. In Stoller's opinion Trustee Richard M. Fogel is an expert at that. Stoller has requested that Judge Schmetterer permit Stoller limited discovery in order to gave current numbers on Go Daddy's use of the Mark STEALTHRAY. Judge Schmetterer denied Stoller request for limited discovery. This Story continues:
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Leo Stoller Appeals Judge William J. Hibbler to the Seventh Circuit
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER APPEALED BANKRUPTCY COURT JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTER ORDER OF SEPTEMPER 1, 2006 converting Stoller's Chapter 13 petition to a Chaper 7 in case No. 05 B 64075. The Appeal was assigned to Northern District of Illinois Judge William J. Hibbler. On June 20, 2007 Judge Hibbler issued an order denying Stoller's appeal on procedural grounds. Stoller has not taken an Appeal of Judge Hibbler's June 20, 2007 decesion directly to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Stoller has at least 7 other Appeals pending before Judge Hibbler. This Story continues:
Monday, June 25, 2007
DELAWARE SUPREME COURT ISSUES RULING ON ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT
Delaware Supreme Court Rules on Attorney Conduct
- In the case of In Re Abbott, read opinion here, the Delaware Supreme Court addressed the propriety of rhetorical extremes, that the trial court had stricken sua sponte, after concluding that the arguments crossed the line of acceptable conduct. Likewise, Judge B. Schmetterer has reprimanded Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel from the law firm of Shaw Gussis http://www.shawgussis.com/ in open court on May 17, 2007 for inappropriate comments he made. In the Re Abbott case the Delaware quoted verbatim from some of the language it found objectionable and reasoned that certain conduct is so unprofessional that it becomes unethical as well, in this case violating Rule 8.4(d) which prohibits professional misconduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. The high court found that the arguments went beyond “merely” unprofessional, and that the rules were violated because the language “unnecessary invective and rhetoric, and were obnoxious [as well as] unnecessarily sarcastic and strident in tone.” Likewise Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel on May 17, 2007 in open court when asked what do you think about Stoller argument, Fogel stated, "More Garbage from the same bag!" Stoller has asserted in a complaint that Fogel engaged in "unnecessary invective and rhetoric that was obnoxious and unnecessarily sarcastic." The Delaware Supreme court could have very well been speaking of Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee when they said, “simply put, insulting conduct toward opposing counsel, and disparaging a court’s integrity are unacceptable by any standard.” The court further reasoned that “zealous advocacy never requires disruptive, disrespectful, degrading or disparaging rhetoric. The use of such rhetoric crosses the line from acceptable forceful advocacy into unethical conduct that violates the Rules of Professional Conduct.” Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) ldms4@gmail.com
- This story continues: http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/should-illinois-bankruptcy-trustee.html
Sunday, June 24, 2007
JUDGE WILLIAM J. HIBBLER SET TO RULE
CHICAGO--NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUDGE WILLIAM HIBBLER IS SET TO RULE ON STOLLER'S MOTION to stay Trustee's authority to Sell Debtor's Interest in all of Stoller's Assets on July 24, 2007. Stoller had offered Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel $100,000 to settle his ligitmate claims and to pay the administrative costs of the proceeding. Instead Stoller has alleged that Illinois Richard M. Fogel has defrauded Julia Bishop out of over $160,000 to settle a "fraudulent" adversary. Fogel even before he has established the validity of even one claim against St
oller's estate has moved to sell Stoller's property for $7500 in a "sham" sale to Fogel's friend attorney Lance G. Johnson, who has set up a "phony" entity to receive the assets. Stoller has urged the U.S. Justice Department to "charge" Fogel and Johnson for bank fraud. Judge William J. Hibbler is set to Rule on Monday as to whether he will grant Stoller's motion for a stay. This story continues:
oller's estate has moved to sell Stoller's property for $7500 in a "sham" sale to Fogel's friend attorney Lance G. Johnson, who has set up a "phony" entity to receive the assets. Stoller has urged the U.S. Justice Department to "charge" Fogel and Johnson for bank fraud. Judge William J. Hibbler is set to Rule on Monday as to whether he will grant Stoller's motion for a stay. This story continues:Saturday, June 23, 2007
SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS GRANTS STOLLER'S MOTION
CHICAGO--THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HAS granted Stoller's motion for a 30 additional days to file an initial appeal brief and short Appendix in the Leo D. Stoller v. Pure Fishing Appeal No. 07-1939. Stoller was previously denied a request for an extension of time to file an appeal brief in a previous Pure Fishing Appeal. Stoller filed a Motion under 60(b) before the District Court Judge Lindberg. Lindberg denied Stoller relief from judgment and "bingo" Stoller ldms4@hotmail.com is now back before the Seventh Circuit. Stoller has to the end of July to file his appeal brief.
Friday, June 22, 2007
STOLLER CALLS FOR THE REMOVAL OF ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL
CHICAGO--STOLLER HAS CALLED FOR THE REMOVAL OF ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL. Stoller has moved before the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ requesting that Richard M. Fogel be ordered to take a psychiatric examination to determine whether he is "fit" to practice law. Stoller has filed attorney disciplinary complaints before the ARDC and a criminal bankruptcy fraud complaint before the U.S. Justice Department against Fogel. Stoller calls for the removal of Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel. Stoller ldms4@hotmail.com has alleged that Fogel's blatant misfeasance in Stoller's bankruptcy case No. 05-64075 in the Northern District of Illinois is extreme and ongoing. Fogel is with the law firm of Shaw Gussis http://www.shawgussis.com/ This Story continues:
Thursday, June 21, 2007
STOLLER ASSERTS THAT SARA E. LORBER ESQ FILES A FRIVILIOUS OBJECTION TO STOLLER MOTION TO VACATE NUNC PRO TUNC
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER ASSERTS THAT ATTORNEY SARA E. LORBER FROM SEYFARTH SHAW www.seyfath.com filed a frivilious Objection to Leo Stoller's Motion in Case No. 05-B 64075 In the Northern District of Illinois, to Vacate Nunc Pro Tunc http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/n083.htm all of the settlement agreements that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel has entered into. The said alleged settlement agreements are void ab initio http://www.lectlaw.com/def/a119.htm . None of the agreements were drafted by Richard M. Fogel, all of the said settlement agreements contain the
wrong parties and are not consistent with Judge Jack Schmetterer order of September 2006 converting the said Chapter 13 to a Chapter 7. The only well written settlement agreement that Trustee Fogel is involved with, is the Go Daddy Settlement agreement which was drafted by a new young lawyer PATRICK CLISHAM http://www.shawgussis.com/attorneys/pclisham.html from Fogel's firm Shaw Guiss http://www.shawgussis.com/ . Upon information and belief Mr. Clisham informed Fogel that all of his previous agreements were drafted incorrectly, but Trustee Fogel believed that Stoller was "too dumb" to "catch it". Stoller has alleged in attorney disciplinary complaints and in a U.S Justice Department criminal Complaint that Fogel has been in a "scheme" to defraud the estate of Leo Stoller since his appointment as Trustee Fogel in September of 06. It is interesting to note that neither lead counsel William J. Factor from Sefarth Shaw or Lance G. Johnson form Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ dared to sign the frivolous Pure Fishing's Objection to Leo Stoller's Motion to Vacate Nunc Pro Tunc. They recuted a
young woman attorney Sara E. Lorber to "hang her out to dry" and let her "take the fall" at the ARDC http://www.iardc.org/ "alone" . Stoller has already filed attorney disciplinary complaints against Factor and Johnson and this this time they want to "hide" behind poor Associate Sara E. Lorber by not exposing themselve to further ARDC charges from the filing of a pleading in violation of 3.3(a). http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html This story continues:
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/da-mike-nifong-was-disbarred-should.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-alleges-that-illinois.html
wrong parties and are not consistent with Judge Jack Schmetterer order of September 2006 converting the said Chapter 13 to a Chapter 7. The only well written settlement agreement that Trustee Fogel is involved with, is the Go Daddy Settlement agreement which was drafted by a new young lawyer PATRICK CLISHAM http://www.shawgussis.com/attorneys/pclisham.html from Fogel's firm Shaw Guiss http://www.shawgussis.com/ . Upon information and belief Mr. Clisham informed Fogel that all of his previous agreements were drafted incorrectly, but Trustee Fogel believed that Stoller was "too dumb" to "catch it". Stoller has alleged in attorney disciplinary complaints and in a U.S Justice Department criminal Complaint that Fogel has been in a "scheme" to defraud the estate of Leo Stoller since his appointment as Trustee Fogel in September of 06. It is interesting to note that neither lead counsel William J. Factor from Sefarth Shaw or Lance G. Johnson form Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ dared to sign the frivolous Pure Fishing's Objection to Leo Stoller's Motion to Vacate Nunc Pro Tunc. They recuted a
young woman attorney Sara E. Lorber to "hang her out to dry" and let her "take the fall" at the ARDC http://www.iardc.org/ "alone" . Stoller has already filed attorney disciplinary complaints against Factor and Johnson and this this time they want to "hide" behind poor Associate Sara E. Lorber by not exposing themselve to further ARDC charges from the filing of a pleading in violation of 3.3(a). http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html This story continues:http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/da-mike-nifong-was-disbarred-should.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-alleges-that-illinois.html
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
SHOULD ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL AND LANCE G. JOHNSON BE INDICTED FOR BANKRUPTCY FRAUD?
CHICAGO--SHOULD ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL AND ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON BE INDICTED FOR BANKRUPTCY FRAUD? THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT MUST DECIDE. LEO STOLLER HAS ALLEGED THAT HE AND HIS BANKRUPTCY ESTATE IS THE VICTIM OF A "ROGUE TRUSTEE" RICHARD M. FOGEL. STOLLER HAS ALLEGED THAT Fogel http://www.shawgussis.com/ has conspired with attorney Lance G. .jpg)
Johnson http://www.roylance.com/ to obtain all of the assets and trademarks of Leo Stoller's estate for a mere $7500.00. Lance G. Johnson had billed his client Pure Fishing over $500,000 to obtain just one of Stoller's STEALTH Federal Trademarks in Case No. 05 CV 00725 Northern District of Illinois. Now Trustee Fogel according to Stoller's allegations has set up a scheme where Lance G. Johnson has created a "sham" entity (SPTA) THE "Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse" in an attempt to acquire over $10,000,000 (ten million dollars worth of Federal Trademark Registrations) for a mere $7500.00. Judge Jack B. Schmetterer said that it sounds like "collusion." Stoller has invited the U.S. Justice Department to investigate because Fogel's alleged scheme is worthy of a grand jury indictment for bankruptcy fraud, according to Stoller charges. Stoller has moved for a stay of the sale pending his appeals. Fogel has opposed the stay. This Story continues:http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-moves-for-discovery-in-go-daddy.html
Johnson http://www.roylance.com/ to obtain all of the assets and trademarks of Leo Stoller's estate for a mere $7500.00. Lance G. Johnson had billed his client Pure Fishing over $500,000 to obtain just one of Stoller's STEALTH Federal Trademarks in Case No. 05 CV 00725 Northern District of Illinois. Now Trustee Fogel according to Stoller's allegations has set up a scheme where Lance G. Johnson has created a "sham" entity (SPTA) THE "Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse" in an attempt to acquire over $10,000,000 (ten million dollars worth of Federal Trademark Registrations) for a mere $7500.00. Judge Jack B. Schmetterer said that it sounds like "collusion." Stoller has invited the U.S. Justice Department to investigate because Fogel's alleged scheme is worthy of a grand jury indictment for bankruptcy fraud, according to Stoller charges. Stoller has moved for a stay of the sale pending his appeals. Fogel has opposed the stay. This Story continues:http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-moves-for-discovery-in-go-daddy.htmlTuesday, June 19, 2007
STOLLER MOVES FOR DISCOVERY IN GO DADDY HEARING
CHICAGO--JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER IN NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CASE NO. 05-64075 held a hearing on the value of the Notice of Opposition that Stoller filed against the Go Daddy trademark Application for the Mark Stealthray. Go Daddy put on their case last Friday. Judge Schmetterer allowed Stoller case to be heard in two weeks. Stoller has moved for discovery and for Go Daddy to produce their President for a Deposition in order for Stoller to be able to establish the value of the said Opposition. Go Daddy's witness on last Friday claimed she did not know the sales and/or even the value to Stealthray to Go Daddy. Trustee Fogel on the stand admitted that he did not know what the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) was and that he knew nothing about trademark or trademark law. Stoller has alleged that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel has attempted to "defraud" the estate of Leo Stoller by "conspiring" with Go Daddy to "dismiss" the said Opposition in exchange for a "phony" bankruptcy claim filed by Go Daddy. In the Friday hearing Go Daddy's witness testified that Leo Stoller's owes Go Daddy "nothing". Stoller has alleged that Trustee Fogel has engaged in a pattern of "breaches" of his fiduciary duties to the Estate of Leo Stoller ldms4@ghotmail.com and fraud This story continues:
Monday, June 18, 2007
JUDGE TO CONSIDER HOLDING ATTORNEY MIKE NIFONG IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT FOR LYING IN THE COURT
RELEIGH, N.C. ATTORNEYS FOR THE DUKE PLAYERS WHO WERE FALSELY accused by D.A. Mike Nifong have filed a request for the Judge to hold Mr. Nifong in Criminal contempt for lying to the court. Nifong was disbarred Saturday. A ruling that came only a day before Mr. Nifong announced that he planned to resign as Durham County's district attorney. This Story continues:
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-urges-us-justice-department-to.htmlD.A. MIKE NIFONG WAS DISBARRED--SHOULD ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY RICHARD M. FOGEL AND ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATOR ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON BE DISBARRED?
CHICAGO--District Attorney Mike Nifong was disbarred for his unlawful prosecution of three Duke University lacrosse players falsely accused of rape. The North Carolina State Bar charged Nifong with breaking several rules of professional conduct including lying to the court. Douglas Brocker, State Bar prosecutor told the disciplinary committee that D.A. Mike Nifong wove a "Web of deception that has continued up through this hearing...Mr. Nifong did not act as a minister of justice, but as a minister of injustice." Like Stoller has alleged that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel http://www.shawgussis.com/ has also during the prosecution of bankruptcy Case No. 05 B 64075 made a misstatement of material fact to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer on May 18, 2007 in violation of ARDC Rule 3.3(a) http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html. (You can decide for yourself) Judge Schmetter from the offical transcript said,"Okay. Now have you folks, any of you (speaking to Richard M. Fogel and his assistant Jancise Alwin) heard from (the law firm of) Katten Muchin? Ms. Alwin responded "No". Richard M. Fogel said, "No". Leo Stoller then responded, "That's not true. Katten Muchin, Bonnie--I had a lawyer call from Katten Muchin, spoke with Mr. Fogel earlier in the week..." After Fogel was put on the spot in open court Mr. Fogel on page 9 of the transcript finally admits that, "I was contacted by an attorney named John Siegler from Katten Muchin several days ago, who asked me questions about the adversary complaint that I have pending against Julie Bishop..." Stoller alleges that aside from Mr. Fogel propensity to not tell the truth in court that like Mr. Nifong, Mr. Fogel has been "weaving a web of deception" through the said bankruptcy proceeding which is now culminating a an alleged "scheme" to dispose of all of Stoller's trademarks to Lance G. Johnson for a mere $7500.00, after Lance G. Johnson http://www.roylance.com/ has billed his client Pure Fishing over a half million dollars in the prosecution of Leo Stoller. Stoller has alleged that Fogel and Johnson have conspired to set up a "sham" entity to purchase the Stoller's trademarks at a phony action that Fogel set up. There is "no" legitimate purchaser, there is no "arms" length transaction. This Fraudulent action set up by Fogel, Stoller has alleged, with Lance Johnson is nothing more than a scheme to defraud the estate of Leo Stoller in violation of the Bankruptcy Code. Stoller has asserted that the Law licenses of Fogel and Lance Johnson should go the way of Mike Nifong's and Fogel and Lance G. Johnson Stoller has urged should be prosecuted by the U.S. Justice Department for Bankruptcy Fraud. Stoller has filed a criminal bankruptcy fraud complaint against William M. Fogel, Lance G. Johnson and others regarding this matter and is confidence that the US. Justice Department will act soon to charge Fogel and Johnson with bankruptcy fraud.
Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) ldms4@hotmail.com This story continues:
Sunday, June 17, 2007
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MIKE NIFONG DISBARRED
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA-- AEAE reports in an unanimous finding against Mike Nifong the disciplinary committee meeting Saturday found against Nifong his conduct was ``prejudicial to the administration of justice'' and that he lied to the court about evidence. Mike Nifong was disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar for breaking rules of professional conduct while handling rape allegations against Duke University lacrosse players. Nifong ``wandered off the path of justice,'' panel chairman Lane Williamson said after announcing the decision to lift the career prosecutor's law license. The three white athletes were later exonerated in the case, which began with a black stripper's allegations she was assaulted at a team party according to Bloombreg report. In a related attorney professional misconduct story, Leo Stoller the Director of AEAE, has alleged that the following attorneys conduct in Illinois Case No 05 B 64075 has been ``prejudicial to the administration of justice'' and that Fogel has lied to the court. The said attorneys charged by Stoller are : Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel from the law firm of Shaw Gussis http://www.shawgussis.com/ Lance G. Johnson from the law firm of Roylance, Abrams Berdo & Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ William J. Factor from the law firm of Seyfath Shaw http://www.seyfath.com/ et all have also "wandered off the path of justice" and have filed attorney disciplinary charges against them. Leo Stoller ldms4@hotmail.com is the Executive Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) a Chicago attorney ethics "watch dog" group that has for over 25 years advocated the strict enforcement of attorney ethics to enhance the reputation of the legal profession. This story continues:
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-alleges-that-illinois.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-urges-us-justice-department-to.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-alleges-that-illinois.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-urges-us-justice-department-to.html
Saturday, June 16, 2007
STOLLER ALLEGES THAT ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD STOLLER ESTATE WITH GO DADDY OF $5 MILLION DOLLARS
CHICAGO--IN A TRIAL BEFORE JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER in Case No. 05-64075 in the Northern District of Illinois, Leo Stoller has attempted to establish through the testimony of Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel that the bankruptcy claims of Go Daddy Software are frivilious and without merit. Go Daddy witness as admitted on the stand that Leo Stoller does not owe Go Daddy any thing. Stoller argued that Judge Schmetterer should disavow the said claims and reject the settlement entered into with Richard M. Fogel Trustee. The alleged consideration is the forgiveness of Go Daddy's worthless claim. Stoller a nationally know trademark expert values Go Daddy acquision of the STEALTHRAY Federal Trademark Registration at 5 Million dollars. Stoller argues that it is clear from the record that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel is conspiring with Go Daddy to dismiss Stoller's Notice of Opposition to the Registration of Go Daddy's STEALTHRAY trademark Application in exchange for a release of a meritless claim. Costing the estate of Leo Stoller over $5 million dollar loss. Stoller has alleged that Trustee Fogel has engaged in a pattern of bankruptcy fraud in order to defraud the estate of Leo Stoller. Stoller ldms4@hotmail.com has filed with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission http://www.iardc.org/ a request to have Richard M. Fogel Trustee take a psychiatric exam to determine whether Fogel has a personality disorder that would preclude him from engaging in the practice of law. http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/05/stoller-alleges-that-richard-m-fogel.html Stoller has also filed a criminal bankruptcy fraud with the Justice Department against Fogel. This story continues:
Friday, June 15, 2007
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BURKE GRANTS LEO STOLLER'S MOTION
CHICAGO--ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BURKE GRANTS LEO STOLLER's motion for leave to file reply to objection to petition for writ of mandamus instanter filed under seal. Stoller had filed a Writ of Mandamus with the Illinois Supreme Court in order to have the court order the Illinois Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ to re-open an ARDC attorney investigation which was, in Stoller's opinion closed prematurely. Leo Stoller is a nationally known legal ethics expert who is the national spokesman for the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE). A Chicago based attorney ethics "watch dog" group that has advocated the strict enforcement of attorney ethics for over 25 years in order to enhance the legal profession's reputation. ldms4@hotmail.com This story continues: http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/05/ardc-files-object-to-petition-for-writ.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/aeae-list-of-attorneys-that-are-not.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-charges-lance-g-johnson-david-s.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/aeae-list-of-attorneys-that-are-not.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-charges-lance-g-johnson-david-s.html
JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO SUPPORTS FREE SPEECH RIGHTS
CHICAGO--THERE ARE MANY LAWYERS AND JUDGES THAT VISIT LEO STOLLER'S BLOG DAILY AND WHO ARE OPPOSED to Leo Stoller free speech rights. But the Associated Press reported that Supreme court Justice Alito nevertheless offered strong support for free speech rights in remarks Wednesday to a group on Capitol Hill. The comments hold particular interest because First Amendment freedoms are at the heart of two pending cases.
Asked by a young woman how to draw the line in the Internet age when people can and do say anything online, Alito said he takes a dim view of laws and policies that limit speech rights.
"I'm a very strong believer in the First Amendment and the right of people to speak and to write. I would be reluctant to support restrictions on what people can say," Alito said at the National Italian-American Foundation luncheon.
"There are some restrictions that have been held to be consistent with the First Amendment, but it's very dangerous for the government to restrict speech," the justice said.
People can register their disapproval with someone's speech "without having government censor it," he said. All of the attorneys listed in the attached links below strongly oppose Stoller's ldms4@hotmail.com right to free speech, you can read it and see why:
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/04/illinois-bankruptcy-trustee-richard-m_11.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/aeae-list-of-attorneys-that-are-not.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-charges-lance-g-johnson-david-s.html
Asked by a young woman how to draw the line in the Internet age when people can and do say anything online, Alito said he takes a dim view of laws and policies that limit speech rights.
"I'm a very strong believer in the First Amendment and the right of people to speak and to write. I would be reluctant to support restrictions on what people can say," Alito said at the National Italian-American Foundation luncheon.
"There are some restrictions that have been held to be consistent with the First Amendment, but it's very dangerous for the government to restrict speech," the justice said.
People can register their disapproval with someone's speech "without having government censor it," he said. All of the attorneys listed in the attached links below strongly oppose Stoller's ldms4@hotmail.com right to free speech, you can read it and see why:
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/04/illinois-bankruptcy-trustee-richard-m_11.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/aeae-list-of-attorneys-that-are-not.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-charges-lance-g-johnson-david-s.html
Thursday, June 14, 2007
STOLLER URGES U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO ISSUE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS TO RICHARD M. FOGEL, LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID S. ABRAMS & AFRED N. GOODMAN
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER URGES THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT to issue subpoenas to Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel http://www.shawgussis.com/ , Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ requiring them to appeal before a grand jury to investigate the criminal complaint and the allegations of bank fraud that Stoller has asserted against them. Judge Jack B. Schmetterer in Northern District of Illinois Case No. 05-B-64075 
described Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel scheme to sell the trademarks of Leo Stoller to Lance G. Johnson as "collusion". Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman have according to Stoller's allegation set up a front company to purchase over 100 trademarks valued at over 1,000,000.00 (1 million dollars) for only $7500.00 dollars. Stoller has alleged that Fogel, Johnson, Abrams and Goodman are engaged in a scheme to defraud Stoller out of his valuable trademarks. The Justice Department is urged to issued subpoenas to Trustee Richard M. Fogel, Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman and to bring them before a grand jury to investigate Stoller's charges contained in his criminal complaint filed with the US. Justice Department before the all of the assets of Stoller are sold through this alleged "fraudulent auction scheme!. This Story continues:
described Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel scheme to sell the trademarks of Leo Stoller to Lance G. Johnson as "collusion". Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman have according to Stoller's allegation set up a front company to purchase over 100 trademarks valued at over 1,000,000.00 (1 million dollars) for only $7500.00 dollars. Stoller has alleged that Fogel, Johnson, Abrams and Goodman are engaged in a scheme to defraud Stoller out of his valuable trademarks. The Justice Department is urged to issued subpoenas to Trustee Richard M. Fogel, Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman and to bring them before a grand jury to investigate Stoller's charges contained in his criminal complaint filed with the US. Justice Department before the all of the assets of Stoller are sold through this alleged "fraudulent auction scheme!. This Story continues:Wednesday, June 13, 2007
CHARLES SCHUMER TRIES TO "SHOOT" DOWN ALBERTO GONZALES--AEAE GIVE GONZALES VOTE OF CONFIDENCE
CHICAGO--THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) HAS GIVEN ATTORNEY GENERAL ALBERTO GONZALES A VOTE OF "CONFIDENCE". AEAE is a Chicago based attorney ethics "watch dog" group that has advocated the strict enforcement of attorney ethics. AEAE has found nothing in the conduct of Mr. Gonzales to be unethical. The liberal "left wing" gun toting Senator from New York, Charles Schumer a Democratic attempted to "gun down" Gonzales conducting a vote of no confidence. On a 53-38 roll call vote Monday, the Democrats fell seven votes short of the 60 needed to begin the debate on a resolution condemning Gonzales. AEAE states that Alberto Gonzales is one of the finest Attorney Generals that the US has ever had. Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of AEAE lsma4@gmail.com This Story continues:
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
STOLLER CHARGES LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID S. ABRAMS AND AFRED N. GOODMAN WITH COLLUSION AND FRAUD
CHICAGO--Leo Stoller charges Lance G. Johnson Esq., David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman from the law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ with conspiracy, fraud and collusion in a new disciplinary complaints with ARDC http://www.iardc.org/ and the DC BAR http://www.dcbar.org/. Lance G. Johnson in conjunction with Illinois Bankruptcy trustee Richard M. Fogel from the law firm of Shaw Gussis http://www.shawgussis.com/ , according to the complaint have conspired to set up a fictitious company the Association to Prevent Trademark Abuse for the sole purpose to purchase Stoller's trademark in a bankruptcy proceeding. Judge Jack B. Schmetterer said in open court that Johnson and Fogel's sales agreement sounded like "collusion"! Stoller plans on seeking leave to sue them for $25 million dollars each.
Learn more about attorney misconduct in order to "stamp it out" click here:
Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics AEAE, a Chicago attorney watch dog group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics for over 25 years. "If you see attorney misconduct report it" http://www.abanet.org/cpr/regulation/scpd/disciplinary.htmlThis story continues:
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/judge-calls-deal-to-sell-trademarks-to.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/shaw-grass-refuses-to-remove-illinois.htmlhttp://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/05/stoller-files-motion-to-disqualify_30.htmlhttp://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/05/former-seyfarth-shaw-llp-attorneys.html
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/aeae-list-of-attorneys-that-are-not.htmlhttp://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/shaw-grass-refuses-to-remove-illinois.htmlhttp://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/05/stoller-files-motion-to-disqualify_30.htmlhttp://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/05/former-seyfarth-shaw-llp-attorneys.html
Monday, June 11, 2007
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER FOR HIS PERSONAL BIAS AND PREJUDICE
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER FILED A MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER ON MAY 16, 2007 IN NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CASE NO. 05-B 64075. Stoller alleges that in almost 2 years of litigation Judge Schmetterer has never granted Stoller one motion (other than a pauperis petition). That in over 37 years of litigation before numerous Judges in the State and Federal Court System this has never happened in Stoller's litigation career, that a judge would "never" grant Stoller Motions. Now Judge Schmetterer has filed an Order requesting that Stoller be more specific in his allegations of "bias" and "prejudice" against the Debtor pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 144, 455. After Stoller filed his motions to Disqualify Judge Schmetterer and the Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel, Judge Schmetterer has now issued an Order to Show Cause Under Rule 9011 to consider sanctioning Stoller for even filing a Motion of May 29, 2007 to disqualify Trustee Fogel. Leo Stoller is a national expert on the issue of Judicial Ethics and is the Executive Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE) for over 25 years. A Chicago Judicial watch group that advocates the strict enforcement of Judicial Ethics. AEJE also advocates "cameras" in court rooms in order for the Public to be able to judge for themselves if a "judge" acts in a Bias and Prejudice manner toward one party. Judges can act in a "bias and Prejudice" manner as long as the courts prevent "cameras" in the court rooms, the U.S. Public every day is being robbed of "equal justice" for all of its citizens by courts not allowing camera in court rooms: The Fogel Story continues: http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/stoller-file-third-motion-to-disqualify.html
Saturday, June 09, 2007
LOST A FRIEND
CHICAGO--COMMENTARY--TODAY I lost of friend of 41 years. A friend that I used to run and play together...A Friend that I looked forward to seeing again...A friend that taught me that "being full of life" is life. A friend that I never new to get "angry". Never said a bad word about any one. Never lied, never cheated, never did anything that anyone could ever say was "wrong". A friend that touched everyone in a special way...I know that my friend is now happy and content...I know that my friend is now with her "favorite" friends...I know that my friend will wait for me so we can all be together once again...
LEO STOLLER FILES APPEAL BRIEF IN GOOGLE INC CASE
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER FILED HIS APPEAL BRIEF IN GOOGLE INC., APPEAL BEFORE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN CASE NOS 07-1569, 07-1612 AND 07-1651. Google Inc., brought a civil Rico action against Stoller companies in retaliation for Stoller filing a Petition to Cancel the Google Inc., Federal Trademark Registration which has become "generic" and is now listed in the dictionary. Leo Stoller is an Appellate expert ldms4@hotmail.com This story continues:
Friday, June 08, 2007
STOLLER ASSERTS THAT THE FIRM OF ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN ARE MISLEADING THE PUBLIC
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER CHARGES LANCE G. JOHNSON AND HIS FIRM OF ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN .jpg)
LLP WITH MISLEADING THE PUBLIC "Roylance". Currently, Roylance is featuring on the home page of its web site http://www.roylance.com/ a story that states: Seventh Circuit Dismisses Appeal by Leo Stoller: By Lance G. Johnson "The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Leo Stoller against the outcomes of the trademark infringement case Central Mfg. Co. vs. Pure Fishing, Inc. The dismissal of Mr. Stoller’s appeal ends decades of .jpg)
trademark infringement lawsuits and oppositions of questionable factual foundation. By upholding the original conviction, the court validates Pure Fishing’s assertion that Mr. Stoller’s trademarks were invalid and that the injunction levied against him was just and fair." What David S. Abrams http://www.roylance.com/att.asp?id=1, Afred N. Goodman http://www.roylance.com/att.asp?id=10 and Lance G. Johnson http://www.roylance.com/att.asp?id=14 are knowingly and willfully concealing from the public is that Leo Stoller's Appeal brief in Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the Pure Fishing Case No-07-1936 is due on July 7, 2007. See attached order of the Seventh Circuit. Stoller suggests that you should email Lance G. Johnson ljohnson@roylance.com David S. Abrams dabrams@roylance.com and Afred N. Goodman agoodman@roylance.com and ask them why are they misleading the public. Ask them if this is the way they run a law firm? Story Note: after Stoller published this story and the firm of Roylance was caught, David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman removed the misleading front page of their web site. Stoller ldms4@hotmail.com has it saved if any one wants to see it. This story continues
LLP WITH MISLEADING THE PUBLIC "Roylance". Currently, Roylance is featuring on the home page of its web site http://www.roylance.com/ a story that states: Seventh Circuit Dismisses Appeal by Leo Stoller: By Lance G. Johnson "The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Leo Stoller against the outcomes of the trademark infringement case Central Mfg. Co. vs. Pure Fishing, Inc. The dismissal of Mr. Stoller’s appeal ends decades of 
trademark infringement lawsuits and oppositions of questionable factual foundation. By upholding the original conviction, the court validates Pure Fishing’s assertion that Mr. Stoller’s trademarks were invalid and that the injunction levied against him was just and fair." What David S. Abrams http://www.roylance.com/att.asp?id=1, Afred N. Goodman http://www.roylance.com/att.asp?id=10 and Lance G. Johnson http://www.roylance.com/att.asp?id=14 are knowingly and willfully concealing from the public is that Leo Stoller's Appeal brief in Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the Pure Fishing Case No-07-1936 is due on July 7, 2007. See attached order of the Seventh Circuit. Stoller suggests that you should email Lance G. Johnson ljohnson@roylance.com David S. Abrams dabrams@roylance.com and Afred N. Goodman agoodman@roylance.com and ask them why are they misleading the public. Ask them if this is the way they run a law firm? Story Note: after Stoller published this story and the firm of Roylance was caught, David S. Abrams and Afred N. Goodman removed the misleading front page of their web site. Stoller ldms4@hotmail.com has it saved if any one wants to see it. This story continuesThursday, June 07, 2007
ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL AND WILLIAM J. FACTOR ARE BIG NEWS ON THE INTERNET!
CHICAGO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL AND ATTORNEY WILLIAM J FACTOR E are becoming big news all over the the Internet. Fogel is from the Chicago law firm of Shaw Gussis http://www.shawgussis.com/ Factor is from the firm of Seyfarth Shaw http://www.seyfath.com/ Read all about it! Read more here: http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/shaw-grass-refuses-to-remove-illinois.html
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
JUDGE CALLS DEAL TO SELL TRADEMARKS TO LANCE G. JOHNSON "COLLUSION"?
CHICAGO--JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER in case Northern District of Illinois Case no. 05 B 64075 called a agreement that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel http://www.shawgussis.com/ signed with Attorney Lance G. Johnson from the firm of http://www.roylance.com/ Roylance, Abrams & Goodman "collusion". Richard M. Fogel told Judge Schmetterer in open court that all of the alleged buyers of the said assets would "not" be revealed to the Debtor for fear of being sued. Judge Schmetterer said that deal sounds like "collusion". Judge Schmetterer said he would re-draft a proper agreement. Stoller has filed attorney disciplinary charges http://www.iardc.org/ against Lance G. Johnson and members of the firm of Roylance, Abrams & Goodman for professional misconduct along with additional charges against Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel for "collusion" and other violations growing out of the incident. Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) ldms4@hotmail.com This story continues: http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/aeae-list-of-attorneys-that-are-not.html
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
AEAE ANOUNCES THE THREE MOST ADMIRED AREAS OF LAW IN WHICH TO PRACTICE
CHICAGO--AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) A CHICAGO ATTORNEY WATCH DOG group that has advocated for over 25 years the strict enforcement of attorney ethics has recently announced the three most admired areas of law to practice in. The number one area is Appellate Attorneys who perform "pro se" appeals for inmates. The number two area of law that is most admired by the public are "criminal" defense lawyers. The third area of law to practice in that is most admired by the public are "environmental" attorneys. The least admired area of law that the public has disdain for, are those attorneys who are engaged in the practice of praying on the most vulnerable in our society. Collection attorneys, foreclosure attorneys and Bankruptcy Trustees. AEAE accepts funds from no source. Leo Stoller is the Executive Director ldms4@hotmail.com The following link contines names of attorneys: Collection attorneys, foreclosure attorneys and Bankruptcy Trustees et al that you should know. http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/06/aeae-list-of-attorneys-that-are-not.html
Monday, June 04, 2007
STOLLER MOVES TO VACATE NUNC PRO TUNC PURE FISHING AND GOOGLE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER HAS MOVED BEFORE JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER in Case No. 05 B 64075 in the Northern District of Illinois to vacate settlement agreements entered into by Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel. Fogel entered into a series of settlement agreements with Pure Fishing Co., to resolve District Court Case No. 05 C 725 and to resolve a controversy with Google Inc. Stoller has moved to Vacate Nunc Pro Tunc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nunc_pro_tunc.
Leo Stoller is a legal scholar, legal ethics and trademark expert ldms4@hotmail.com
AEAE 2007 LIST OF ATTORNEYS THAT ARE "NOT" RECOMENDED
CHICAGO--THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) A CHICAGO ATTORNEY WATCH DOG group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics for over 25 years maintains a list of attorneys and law firms who are "not" recomended. This list consists of attorneys names and law firms who AEAE receives complaints of and/or in the opinion of AEAE are lawyers and/or law firms who AEAE would not recomend or who AEAE would not consider hiring. The following is a partial list of "not recomended" attorneys and law firms: Mike Nifong, William Jefferson Clinton, Lynne G. Beresford, the law firm of http://www.shawgussis/ , attorneys: Alexander, Jeffrey S.Alwin, Janice A.Bodenstein, Ira Clisham, Patrick.Fishman, Robert M.Fogel, Richard M.Geller, Jay S.Glantz, Robert W.Gouveia, Gordon E. Guon, Allen J.Gussis, Randy S.Gussis, Samuel P.Hanson, Rebecca J. Harris, Jason S. Horwitch, David S.Klein, Michael J. Lalich, Nicole S. Lichtenfeld, Samuel A.Radtke, Mark L.Roberts, Peter J.Saldinger, Richard A.Shaw, Brian L.Shaw, David L.Spathis, George J.Summers, Kristina M.Towbin, Steven B.Widman, Jeffrey L. Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams, Alfred N. Goodman and the firm of http://www.roylance.com/ , William J. Barrett and the Law firm of