SEVENTH CIRCUIT GRANTS STOLLER'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE GOOGLE APPEALS
Saturday, March 31, 2007
SEVENTH CIRCUIT GRANTS STOLLER'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE GOOGLE APPEALS
CHICAGO--THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT HAS GRANTED LEO STOLLER'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE three Google Inc., Appeals No. 07-1651, 07-1569 and Appeal No. 07-1612 for judicial economy. Stoller has alleged that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel Esq., and Google Inc.'s attorney Michael T. Zeller colluded to obtain a default Civil Rico Judgment against Stoller's companies Central Mfg Inc., and Stealth Industries, Inc., by excluding Stoller from being named as a party in Case No. 07 C 385 Northern District of Illinois, when both Zeller and Fogel argued before Judge Jack B. Schmetterer in Case No. 05 B 64075 Northern District of Illinois, to lift the automatic stay so they could sue Stoller for Civil Rico. When Michael T. Zeller did file the Civil Rico Complaint in front of Judge Virginia M. Kendall Case No. 07 C 385, Leo Stoller was not named as a party. Both Zeller and Fogel opposed Stoller's motion for permission to retain counsel to represent his companies in the Civil Rico Action. Both Zeller and Fogel opposed Stoller's motion to intervene in Case No. 07 C 385. Zeller and Fogel then entered into a agreed final judgment confessing judgment against Stoller's companies on all of the allegations of the Civil Rico Action. Zeller and Fogel knew that if they could eliminate Stoller as a party they could obtain a consent judgment on what amounted to a frivilious Civil Rico pleading that was entirely without merit. After Fogel and Zeller consummated their scheme to defraud the court and Stoller, which Stoller has alleged, Leo Stoller filed an ARDC Complaint www.iardc.org/ against Richard M. Fogel, Michael T. Zeller, William J. Factor, William J. Barrett, Kimberly J. Robinson for violating the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct Rules 3.3(a), 8.4(a)4 &5 http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html
Leo Stoller is a legal ethics expert who has for over 25 years been the Executive Director of American for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics, a Chicago group that advocates the stick enforcement of attorney ethics. Stoller has appeared on CBS, Fox News and numerous radio talk shows as an expert and advocate of the stick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com DISCLAIMER: The fact that Stoller has filed a attorney disciplinary against the name attorneys above, does not mean that they are guilty of professional misconduct. They are all presumed Innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Friday, March 30, 2007
WILL ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY RICHARD M. FOGEL STAY OR WILL HE GO?
CHICAGO-LEO STOLLER HAS MOVED TO DISQUALIFY A SLEW OF ATTORNEYS, MICHAEL T. ZELLER, ESQ., ARDC www.iardc.org/ Complaint NO. 07 CI 1125, WILLIAM J. FACTOR Case No. 07 CI 1128, Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel Esq. ARDC Complaint No. 07 CI 1130, William J. Barrett Esq. ARDC Complaint No. 07 CI 1126, Kimberly J. Robinson ARDC Complaint No. 07- CI 1127 all of whom (respondents) are under investigation for professional misconduct by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission for violating the Professional Rules of Conduct Rule(s) 3.3(a), 8.4(a) 4&5. http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html
DISCLAIMER: The fact that Stoller has filed ARDC Complaints against all of the said respondents does not mean they are guilty. They are all presumed innocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Leo Stoller is a legal scholar and legal ethics expert who has for 25 years through the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics Association (AEAE) advocated the strick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/ AEAE does not accept money from any source.
Thursday, March 29, 2007
MICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ., WILLIAM J. FACTOR, ESQ., WILLIAM J. BARRETT WERE "NO SHOWS" IN COURT TODAY!
CHICAGO-IN A HEARING BEFORE JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER attorneys Michael T. Zeller, William Factor and William J. Barrett (respondents) were "no shows". Since the Attorney Registration has opened an investigation into the said respondents, they have elected not to appear today before the court. Richard M. Fogel Esq., Trustee was the only attorney present today. http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/chicago-bankruptcy-trustee-richard-m.html
STOLLER MOVES TO INTERVENE IN GOOGLE PETITION TO CANCEL PROCEEDING
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER A NATIONALLY KNOWN TRADEMARK EXPERT filed a Petition to Cancel (May of 2006) the Google Inc., Federal trademark "google" on the grounds that the term 'google' has become 'generic' and/or 'descriptive' of the services listed under its Registration. Absolute proof of the fact that the Google Registration is descriptive of the services covered under Google Inc.'s registration lay in fact that the term google is now in the dictionary http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google . Stoller filed a Motion for summary judgment in the Petition to cancel proceeding which Google Inc., have refused to respond. In September of 2006, a Trustee Richard M. Fogel http://www.shawgussis.com/attorneys/rfogel.html was appointed and took charge of Stoller's companies Central Mfg Co., and Stealth Industries., Inc. Stoller has alleged that Trustee Fogel colluded with Michael T. Zeller Esq .Click here to download a printable version. of Zeller's Bio. Stoller has asserted that Zeller who makes over 1.6 million dollars a year and Fogel entered into a frivolous settlement agreement in an attempt to deprive Stoller and his estate of its most valuable asset. Currently, Richard M. Fogel Esq., Trustee Case No. 07 CI 1130 http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/chicago-bankruptcy-trustee-richard-m.html and Michael T. Zeller Esq., Case No. 07 CI 1125 Google's attorney are under investigation for violating the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html Zeller is also under investigation in California by the Office of Chief Trial Counsel/Intake, State Bar of California Case No. 07-14504. Stoller asserts that any agreement that Zeller and Fogel entered into and filed before the TTAB Trademark Trial and Appeal Board alleging that a final judgment should be entered in favor of Google Inc., Stoller alleges is void ab initio and that the filing of the said agreement is a violation of ARDC Rule 3.3(a), 8.4(a)4&5 http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html . Stoller intends to amend his ARDC complaint to include the lattest allegations of Professional misconduct against Fogel and Zeller. Stoller has moved to intervene in the said Petition to Cancel proceeding before the TTAB.
DISCLAIMER: The fact that Richard M. Fogel Esq., Trustee and Michael T. Zeller Esq. are under investigation by ARDC www.iardc.org/ does not make them guilty of professional misconduct. They are to be presumed Innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Leo Stoller is a legal scholar, trademark and legal ethics expert ldms4@hotmail.com
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
STOLLER MOVES TO DISQUALIFY RICHARD M. FOGEL TRUSTEE ET AL.
CHICAGO-THE ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION 
(ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ has opened an investigation against Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel Esq., Case No. 07 CI 1130, William J. Factor Esq., Case No. 07 CI 1128, Michael T. Zeller Case No. 07 CI 1125, Calfornia Bar Association Case No. 07-14504, William J. Barrett Esq., Case No. 07-CI 1126 and the well known Kimberly J. F. Robinson Case No. 07 CI 1127. Leo Stoller has moved to disqualify each at.jpg)
torney and to set aside any and all agreements, consent judgments entered into between them and Richard M. Fogel, Esq., Trustee.
(ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ has opened an investigation against Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel Esq., Case No. 07 CI 1130, William J. Factor Esq., Case No. 07 CI 1128, Michael T. Zeller Case No. 07 CI 1125, Calfornia Bar Association Case No. 07-14504, William J. Barrett Esq., Case No. 07-CI 1126 and the well known Kimberly J. F. Robinson Case No. 07 CI 1127. Leo Stoller has moved to disqualify each at
torney and to set aside any and all agreements, consent judgments entered into between them and Richard M. Fogel, Esq., Trustee.Leo Stoller is a legal scholar and ethics expert who is the Executive Director of Americans For the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics for over 25 years. A Chicago group that advocates the strick inforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/
SUE THE BASTARDS BEFORE THEY SUE YOU!
WASHINGTON--THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT HAS MADE IT EASIER TO SUE FOR INFRINGEMENT. Effectively eliminating "the long-held standard of a reasonable apprehension of being sued." Now an "implied threat infringement" is suffice to bring an action the U.S. Federal Circuit ruled. "Promises by the rights holder 
not to sue are not enough to quell fears of being sued." The Federal Circuit has now enshrined the Patent and Trademark attorneys "full employment guarantee". Every party who now holds intellectual property rights or is attempting to acquire intellectual property rights can sue any body who looks left or right before they get sued. By this ruling the Federal Circuit has guaranteed themselves "a full docket for life", according to a patent and trademark attorney interviewed for this column but who did not want to give his name for fear of being associated with Leo Stoller.
Leo Stoller is a legal scholar who provides intellectual property valuations, expert witness testimony and is the Executive Director of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics AEAE, a group that advocates the stick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/
not to sue are not enough to quell fears of being sued." The Federal Circuit has now enshrined the Patent and Trademark attorneys "full employment guarantee". Every party who now holds intellectual property rights or is attempting to acquire intellectual property rights can sue any body who looks left or right before they get sued. By this ruling the Federal Circuit has guaranteed themselves "a full docket for life", according to a patent and trademark attorney interviewed for this column but who did not want to give his name for fear of being associated with Leo Stoller.Leo Stoller is a legal scholar who provides intellectual property valuations, expert witness testimony and is the Executive Director of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics AEAE, a group that advocates the stick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
SWEETIE ITS TIME TO LOOK FOR A NEW LAWYER
MAGIC KINGDOM--TINKER BELL HAS NOW BEEN ARDCED AND LOOKS LIKE SHE WILL CRASH AND BURN SHORTLY. Time to get a "new" legal Eagle that is not so emotional and prone to violate the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html Tinker Bell was very sharp, she took you for $100 g's, the next lawyer will take you for more. I hear Peter Pan Esq., is looking for clients...So tell me how does it feel to be winning, O great one? What it like working for free or maybe you haven't figured it out yet? Like where is all your money going...Face still working on other cases from 1992...unlike the Tim- Cat and your Bob- Cat case, this case is "never" going to end.... the crime that you committed on June 6, 2005 in my mind will live in infamy http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/fdrpearlharbor.htmMICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ., FILES A FRIVILIOUS NOTICE OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN GOOGLE CASE
WASHINGTON--MICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ., Google Inc.'s trademark attorney file a frivilious Notice of United States District Court Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment Against Petitioner Central Mfg Co. (Inc.) (Central) from CAse No. 07-cv-385 Northern District of Illinois. Central had file a petition to cancel the Google Inc., trademark Cancellation No. 92045778 which has become 'generic' and/or 'descriptive' of the services listed under its trademark registration. Evidenced by the fact that the term 'google' is now in the dictionary. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google In retaliation for Leo Stoller, President of Central Mfg filing a petition to cancel, Google Inc., filed a frivilious Rico action against Stoller's companies Case No. 07-Cv-385 (Not against Stoller individually) Notwithstanding the fact that Michael T. Zeller Esq. , had argued before Judge Jack B. Schmetterer in Bankruptcy Case No. 05 B 64075 Northern District of Illinois that Leo Stoller was a necessary party. Once Judge Schmetterer lifted the stay, Zeller filed Google's frivilious Rico Action before Judge Kendell. Both Zeller and the Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel Esq, filed motions before Judge Kendell stating that Leo Stoller was "not a necessary party." Stoller has alleged that Fogel and Zeller have colluted together, entered into a consent judgment in the Civil Rico Action against Stoller's companies, excluding Stoller from the frivilious Civil Rico Case in order to effect a alleged fraudulent settlement agreement, precluding Stoller from either defending either himself and/or retaining counsel to represent his corporations, Central Mfg Inc., and Stealth Industries, Inc.. Both Zeller and Trustee Richard M. Fogel are now under investigation by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission for allegations of professional misconduct involved with their acquiring a alleged "consent judgment."
Leo Stoller has moved to intervene in Cancellation No. 92045778 as a necessary party and to inform the Board that Stoller has appealed Case No. 07-1651 the alleged final Judgment to the Seventh Circut Court of Appeals. Stoller's has filed motions before the Board Requesting that Cancellation No. 92045778 be suspended pending Stoller's appeals and the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission action against Michael T. Zeller Esq., and Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel.
Leo Stoller is a legal Scholar, ethics expert and trademark expert ldms4@hotmail.com/
Leo Stoller has moved to intervene in Cancellation No. 92045778 as a necessary party and to inform the Board that Stoller has appealed Case No. 07-1651 the alleged final Judgment to the Seventh Circut Court of Appeals. Stoller's has filed motions before the Board Requesting that Cancellation No. 92045778 be suspended pending Stoller's appeals and the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission action against Michael T. Zeller Esq., and Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel.
Leo Stoller is a legal Scholar, ethics expert and trademark expert ldms4@hotmail.com/
BEST DEFENSE TO A DEFAMATION ACTION--THE TRUTH
CHICAGO--EVERYONE WHO HAS A BLOG TODAY IS THREATENED WITH A DEFAMATION ACTION SOONER OR LATER. The best defense is the "truth". Always print the truth and the law is on your side. The Supreme Court has held that "prior restraints on speech and publication are the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights" Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart 427 U.S. 539,559 (1976). The law is on the side of the Defendant according to the court. A recent federal court decision demonstrates the difficulty a plaintiff faces seeking injunction relief for defamation. Ameritech v. Voices for Choices Inc., No. 03 C 301
4, 2003 Wl 21078026 (N.D. Ill May 12, 2003). the court addressed the availability of a preliminary injunction in a defamation suit, very difficult. Courts have long held that "the constitutional guaranty of free speech as a general rule prohibits both the courts and the legislature from putting previous restraints on publication. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Dept Store Employees of Am., 400 Ill. 38, 42, 79 N.E. 2d 46,48 (1948). The truth is the ultimate defense against a defamation action.
Leo Stoller is a legal scholar and an "ethics expert" and has for over 25 years been the founder and spokesman for the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) a group that does not accept money and advocates the strick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/
4, 2003 Wl 21078026 (N.D. Ill May 12, 2003). the court addressed the availability of a preliminary injunction in a defamation suit, very difficult. Courts have long held that "the constitutional guaranty of free speech as a general rule prohibits both the courts and the legislature from putting previous restraints on publication. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Dept Store Employees of Am., 400 Ill. 38, 42, 79 N.E. 2d 46,48 (1948). The truth is the ultimate defense against a defamation action.Leo Stoller is a legal scholar and an "ethics expert" and has for over 25 years been the founder and spokesman for the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) a group that does not accept money and advocates the strick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/
Monday, March 26, 2007
TO STAMP OUT PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT AEAE URGES THE FILING OF ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY COMPLAINTS
CHICAGO--AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) a Chicago group, that does not accept any funds, advocates the stick enforcement of attorney ethics, now for over 25 years. In order to stamp ou
t professional misconduct and to improve the image of attorneys, AEAE encourages filing of misconduct complaints against lawyers who violate the rules of professional conduct http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html. Attorneys who use their unique position and knowledge of the law to abuse the law, are "unlawful legal terrorists" that need to be evicted from the practice of the law. Please fine a list of the disciplinary commissions where you can file a attorney disciplinary complaint today. http://www.abanet.org/cpr/regulation/scpd/disciplinary.html HELP AEAE STAMP OUT ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT TO IMPROVE THE LEGAL PROFESSION IMAGE AND FILE YOUR ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLIANT TODAY!
Leo Stoller is the founder and Executive Director of AEAE for 25 years and is an legal ethics expert and national spokesmen for AEAE who has appeared on CBS, FOX NEWS, major NEWS PAPERS and radio talk show advocating the stick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/
t professional misconduct and to improve the image of attorneys, AEAE encourages filing of misconduct complaints against lawyers who violate the rules of professional conduct http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html. Attorneys who use their unique position and knowledge of the law to abuse the law, are "unlawful legal terrorists" that need to be evicted from the practice of the law. Please fine a list of the disciplinary commissions where you can file a attorney disciplinary complaint today. http://www.abanet.org/cpr/regulation/scpd/disciplinary.html HELP AEAE STAMP OUT ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT TO IMPROVE THE LEGAL PROFESSION IMAGE AND FILE YOUR ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLIANT TODAY!Leo Stoller is the founder and Executive Director of AEAE for 25 years and is an legal ethics expert and national spokesmen for AEAE who has appeared on CBS, FOX NEWS, major NEWS PAPERS and radio talk show advocating the stick enforcement of attorney ethics. ldms4@hotmail.com/
CHICAGO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL AND ATTORNEY WILLIAM J. FACTOR UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT
CHICAGO--RICHARD FOGEL ESQ., BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE AND WILLIAM J. FACTOR ESQ., ARE UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT BY THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION (ARDC).http://www.iardc.org/ Leo Stoller filed an attorney disciplinary complaint against Richard Fogel, Esq., Case No. 07 CI 1130 http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/stoller-files-ardc-complaints.html http://www.shawgussis.com/attorneys/rfogel.html, William J. Factor Esq., No. 07 CI 1130 http://www.seyfarth.com/ Janice A. Alwin No. 07 CI 1129 http://www.shawgussis.com/attorneys/jalwin.html and Richard Allen Saldinger No. 07 CI 1131. http://www.shawgussis.com/attorneys/rsaldinger.html Stoller received correspondence from Mryrrha B. Guzman ARDC Counsel dated March 21,2007 http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/ardc-march-21-2007-letter-to-leo.html stating that "the duties of this Commission relate solely to investigating and prosecuting Illinois Attorneys for allegations of violations of our Rules of Professional Conducthttp://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html...From the information you have provided, there is not a sufficient basis for this agency to purse charges of professional misconduct against Alwin and Saldinger. It appears that you named attorneys Ms. Alwin and Mr. Saldinger in your complaint 
solely because they are members of the same law firm (Shaw Guiss www.shawgussis.com/ ). We will request that Mr. Factor and Mr. Fogel submit responses to the matters you have raised regarding their conduct." "...we may initiate proceedings seeking disciplinary action against the lawyer, such as disbarment or suspension from the practice of law. Such proceedings may take a year or more to be concluded."
solely because they are members of the same law firm (Shaw Guiss www.shawgussis.com/ ). We will request that Mr. Factor and Mr. Fogel submit responses to the matters you have raised regarding their conduct." "...we may initiate proceedings seeking disciplinary action against the lawyer, such as disbarment or suspension from the practice of law. Such proceedings may take a year or more to be concluded."Richard M. Fogel, Janice A. Alwin and Richard A. Saldinger are from the famous Chicago bankruptcy firm of Shaw Gussis Fishman Glantx www.shawgussis.com/ . William J. Factor is from the famous Seyfarth & Shaw LLP firm of over 700 attorneys www.seyfarth.com/
Richard Fogel has more than 25 years of experience as a member of the private panel of chapter 7 bankruptcy trustees for the Northern District of Illinois. He has also acted as an operating chapter 11 trustee in a number of cases and has experience counseling other bankruptcy trustees as well as corporate and individual clients in a wide range of insolvency situations.
Richard Fogel has more than 25 years of experience as a member of the private panel of chapter 7 bankruptcy trustees for the Northern District of Illinois. He has also acted as an operating chapter 11 trustee in a number of cases and has experience counseling other bankruptcy trustees as well as corporate and individual clients in a wide range of insolvency situations.
Mr. Fogel has been a speaker at seminars presented by the American Bankruptcy Institute, the Office of the United States Trustee, and the Chicago Bar Association.
MR. FOGEL EDUCATION
Northwestern University (B.S., 1977)
University of Illinois College of Law (J.D., 1980)
MR. FOGEL PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
- American Bankruptcy Institute
- Chicago Bar Association
- National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees
The complainant, Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) , a Chicago based group founded by Leo Stoller over 25 years ago that advocates the strick enforcement of attorney ethics. Leo Stoller an "legal ethics" expert has appeared on CBS, Fox News, on Radio Talk shows and in most major News Papers. As the national spokes man for AEAE ldms4@hotmail.com/
DISCLAIMER: THE FACT THAT LEO STOLLER HAS CHARGED RICHARD M FOGEL, ESQ, TRUSTEE AND WILLIAM J. FACTOR WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS, DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE QUILTY. THEY ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN QUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
Sunday, March 25, 2007
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA HAS RECEIVED LEO STOLLER'S ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT AGAINST MICHAEL T. ZELLER
LOS ANGELES--THE OFFICE OF CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL/INTAKE OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA stated, "We have received your complaint against a California Attorney (Michael T. Zeller) and have assigned it the number 07-14504. We will contact you when our evaluation of your matter is complete. Thank you for your patience."
Scott J. Drexel Chief Trial Counsel State Bar of California1149 South Hill Street, 10th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90015-2299213/765-1468FAX: 213/765-1029 http://www.calbar.ca.gov/ For more t
han 75 years, the State Bar of California has shaped the development of the law, regulated the professional conduct of the state's lawyers and provided greater access to the justice system for all citizens.
Michael T. Zeller Esq., ., http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/will-judge-virginia-kendell-allow.html has been frequently named as one of California's top intellectual property litigators, including in surveys of attorneys published by Los Angeles Magazine and California Lawyer Magazine. Click here to download a printable BIO version. The Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ has already opened an Illinois investigation in Stoller's allegations of Mr. Zeller's professional misconduct http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/ardc-opens-attorney-misconduct.html for charges of violating the ARDC Rules http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html
Scott J. Drexel Chief Trial Counsel State Bar of California1149 South Hill Street, 10th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90015-2299213/765-1468FAX: 213/765-1029 http://www.calbar.ca.gov/ For more t
han 75 years, the State Bar of California has shaped the development of the law, regulated the professional conduct of the state's lawyers and provided greater access to the justice system for all citizens.Michael T. Zeller Esq., ., http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/will-judge-virginia-kendell-allow.html has been frequently named as one of California's top intellectual property litigators, including in surveys of attorneys published by Los Angeles Magazine and California Lawyer Magazine. Click here to download a printable BIO version. The Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) http://www.iardc.org/ has already opened an Illinois investigation in Stoller's allegations of Mr. Zeller's professional misconduct http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/ardc-opens-attorney-misconduct.html for charges of violating the ARDC Rules http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html
Stoller is still waiting to hear from the New York Attorney Grevience Commission on Zeller"s New York Attorney Disciplinary Complaint. http://www.nysba.org/
Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney (AEAE) Ethics for over 25 years and has advocated the strict enforcement of attorney ethics. Stoller has appeared on national Television, CBS, FOX NEWS, radio talk shows, as the spokesman for AEAE. AEAE does not accept any money for its work. ldms4@hotmail.com/ Stoller is know nationally as the "Ralph Nader" of attorney discipline and is considered the nations leading expert in the field.
DISCLAIMER: The fact that Stoller has charged Michael T. Zeller Esq. , with violating the Rules of Professional Conduct does not mean that Mr. Zeller is quilty. Mr. Zeller is presumed innocent until proven quilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Saturday, March 24, 2007
WHAT DOES NANCY PELOSI, JOHN P. MURTHA, BENEDICT ARNOLD AND OSAMA BEN LADEN HAVE IN COMMON?
WASHINGTON, March 23 — The House of Representatives vot
ed to set a timetable for bringing American troops home from Iraq. What does Nancy Pelosi, John P. Murtha, Benedict Arnold, Osama ben Laden and the 2
12 Congressmen, that voted in favor of the Bill to withdraw our troops from the battle field, they all do not want America to win the war. They are traitors!
ed to set a timetable for bringing American troops home from Iraq. What does Nancy Pelosi, John P. Murtha, Benedict Arnold, Osama ben Laden and the 2
12 Congressmen, that voted in favor of the Bill to withdraw our troops from the battle field, they all do not want America to win the war. They are traitors!Thomas Aquinas said that "up to 30 years old you get the face God gave you, after 30 years you get the face you have earned." If Aquinas was alive today he would say after looking at the above people in the photos that their faces represent "pure evil!" Just look at those ugly faces, what do you think?
Al Jazeera reported today that Osama ben Laden said , "We do not have to beat American, with leaders like Nancy Pelosi, John Murtha, Armed Services Chariman Skelton and James Clyburn (pictured above) America will beat itself! Praise Allah! Prase Allah!"
NANCY PELOSI , JOHN P. MARTHA AND BENEDICT ARNOLD....
CHICAGO--AMERICANS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA (APA) a conservative Chicago think tank have identified the central issue that demands that Americans stay the course and finish the job in Iraq or face destruction here at home. What do Nancy Pelosi, John P. Murtha, Benedict Arnold and Osama ben Laden have in common? They all do not want us to win the war. The Arabs are enemies of the west, since the 6th century, a culture war has continued. The Arabs make our former Communist enemies look like patsies. The commies never blew themselves up to kill Americans. When an enemy is willing to kill themselves in order to kill their enemy, that type of enemy must be destroyed completely or they will destroy us. President Bush is right president for our time. Americans need to support him and to vote for Senator McCain for Americana's next president.
PETE AND AUTUMN: HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO US? I NEVER HURT YOU!
ELMWOOD PARK--PETE AND AUTUMN is has been twenty two months and 17 days and 8 hours and 28 minutes....that you were stolen from me...no amount of money will ever compensate me for your loss...I will never forget you nor will I ever forget the evil thief that stole you...Remember the opening scene in the movie "Camelot" King Arthur had massed his troops for an assault on the French castle... the closing "scene"...King Arthur was an hour before the attack.... some day King Arthur will rescue you...from the evil witch...
Friday, March 23, 2007
STOLLER, "Untill the Last Court Speaks!".
CHICAGO--STOLLER ASKS HIGH COURT TO HEAR PURE FISHING CASE. In a two year battle between Pure Fishing and Stoller is was obvious that the only way this controversy would be resolved would be the High Court. Stoller's trademark solgan known to every IP attorney in America "Until the last court speaks!"
Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert who provides trial testimony, IP valuations, surveys, damage reports, IP surveillance, appeal drafting for legal professionals ldms4@hotmail.com/
Thursday, March 22, 2007
'Ghostwriting' Pleadings for Pro Se Litigant Violates Court Rules
NEW JERSY -- U.S. Magistrate Judge Tonianne Bongiovanni ruled in a case of first impression that Ghostwriting pleadings for a pro se litigant violates a lawyer's ethical 
duty of candor to the court and may violate federal court rules. Leo Stoller provides brief writing and appeal drafting services to attorneys only. ldms4@hotmail.com/
duty of candor to the court and may violate federal court rules. Leo Stoller provides brief writing and appeal drafting services to attorneys only. ldms4@hotmail.com/PATENT LITIGATION--DANGEROUS BUSINESS
WASHINGTON-- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the finding of a Delaware district judge that "the so-called ‘580 patent was invalid" because inventors of the technology deceived the U.S. Patent Office. Cantor Fitzgerald, a Wall Street Brokerage Firm lost a patent case with a ruling by the court that its patent was unenforceable. ESPEED lost its appeal over its Bond Trading Patent.
Leo Stoller is an Intellectual Property Expert who provides trial testimony, IP valuations, IP surveillance, surveys, damage reports, brief and appeal drafting to legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
TRADEMARKS V DOMAIN NAMES
CHICAGO--AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECUTAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (AEIPR) has found that many parties who holds rights to Federal Trademarks can proceed with arbitration in order to seek transfer of the infringing domain names. The fact that damages and attorney's fees cannot be obtained through arbitration is off set by the short time it takes to resolve such controversies, months rather than years. ICANN the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers rules usually control. For a trademark holder to prevail and thus to obtain the transfer of a domain name, the trademark holder must show that: (a) the holder has a valid trademark rights and that the domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark; (b) the domain name registrant has no legitimate interest in the domain name; and (c) the domain name was registered in bad faith. Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, Trademark and Domain valuations, Intellectual Property surveillance, brief and appeal drafting for legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
IBM IN TROUBLE
CHICAGO (March 21, 2007)--SuperSpeed LLC sues IBM for patent infringement related to caching technology, which stores a copy of frequently accessed data in the memory of an individual computer. If IBM loses it could cost them billions. It has been almost a year since IBM resolved a similar suit with Oracle Corp. It cost about 5.1 million to litigate a full blow patent infringement case according to the Americans For the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights AEIPR a Chicago group that advocates the strick enforcement of American Intellectual Property Rights. A good expert can help determine the outcome of a Intellectual Property lawsuit. Leo Stoller is a IP professional who provides expert witness testimony, IP valuations, surveys, damage reports, IP surveillance and brief writing and appeal drafting for legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
BLOGGERS MUST DEFEND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
CHICAGO-AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (AEIPR) in a report released today have stated that Bloggers in the 21 century are the first and last vestiges to protect freedom of speech and expression. Any attempt to limit that freedom is an attempt to destroy it.
AEIPR believed freedom of speech cannot be limited without being lost. Not long ago Johannes Gutenberg was named by AEIPR the most influential person of the millennium. Gutenberg invented the printing press in 1450. From that time forward the greatest ideas of the millennium and beyond came to be known by the masses.
Bloggers today are the Gutenberg's of the 21 century and should resist censorship in any of its guises.
Bloggers must Defend of the First Amendment, the rights of free expression and free speech. Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of AEIPR, a trademark expert who provides Intellectual Property valuations, surveys, damage reports, expert witness testimony, trademark services, brief and appeal drafting to legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
AEIPR believed freedom of speech cannot be limited without being lost. Not long ago Johannes Gutenberg was named by AEIPR the most influential person of the millennium. Gutenberg invented the printing press in 1450. From that time forward the greatest ideas of the millennium and beyond came to be known by the masses.
Bloggers today are the Gutenberg's of the 21 century and should resist censorship in any of its guises.
Bloggers must Defend of the First Amendment, the rights of free expression and free speech. Leo Stoller is the Executive Director of AEIPR, a trademark expert who provides Intellectual Property valuations, surveys, damage reports, expert witness testimony, trademark services, brief and appeal drafting to legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
Monday, March 19, 2007
TODAY JUDGE KENDELL GRANTS STOLLER'S MOTION
CHICAGO--JUDGE VIRGINIA GRANTED LEO STOLLER'S MOTION IN THE GOOGLE INC., civil Rico Action today.
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, brief and appeal drafting for legal professionals ldms4@hotmail.com/
MICHAEL T. ZELLER RESPONDS TO STOLLER'S EMAIL REGARDING A HEARING BEFORE JUDGE KENDELL IN THE GOOGLE CASE TODAY
CHICAGO--MICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ., SUNDAY LATE EVENING ABOUT 12:00 AM ,SEND LEO STOLLER AN EMAIL RESPONSE AFTER Stoller emailed Zeller( .Click here to download a printable version. of Zeller's Bio) several courtesy copies of Motions that are up before Judge Kendell this Monday morning at 9:00AM. Stoller wanted to be sure that Michael T. Zeller had received his copies. Here is Mr. Zeller's response:
"Mr. Stoller, your purported service only hours before the presentment time violates the Local Rules, including the minimum notice requirements. You apparently refuse to be deterred by the numerous prior instances in which TTAB and the Courts have sanctioned you for your fraudulent and other improper conduct in service. In any event, notwithstanding your game playing, we already filed and served you with our opposition to your motion."
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, brief and appeal drafting for legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
PROPER FORUM TO RESOLVE CONTROVERSIES ON THIS BLOG ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF USE IS ARBITRATION
CHICAGO- Michael Zeller Esq., a Public Figure, and a partner of the Quinn Emanuel law firm www.quinnemanuel.com/ Mr. Zeller is a Public Figure who has been frequently named as one of California's top intellectual property litigators, including in surveys of attorneys published by Los Angeles Magazine and California Lawyer Magazine.Click here to download a printable version. of Zeller's Bio evidencing his renound.
On Friday and Saturday, this famous Public Figure Mr. Michael T. Zeller .http://www.quinnemanuel.com/attorneys/bioPage.aspx?recid=101 has threatened to sue in Federal Court Leo Stoller for defamation regarding content that Mr. Zeller found objectionable on the Leo Stoller Blog. www.rentmark.blogspot.com/ Leo Stoller emailed Mr. Zeller the following response on Sunday to Mr. Zeller threat to sue Stoller in Federal Court.
"The correct forum for your alleged controversy with the content of the Leo Stoller blog pursuant to the terms of use published at http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2006/06/terms-of-use_08.html and previously emailed to you on many occasions is as follows:"
"If a dispute arises under this agreement, we agree to first try to resolve it with the help of a mutually agreed-upon mediator in the following location: Chicago. Any costs and fees other than attorney fees associated with the mediation and/or arbitration will be born by the moving party. If it proves impossible to arrive at a mutually satisfactory solution through mediation, we agree to submit the dispute to binding arbitration at the following location: Chicago, Illinois under the rules of the American Arbitration Association http://www.adr.org/. Judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitration may be entered in any court with jurisdiction to do so."
I suggest that you can contact JAMS, The Resolution Experts 312-655-0555 http://www.jamsadr.com/or Resolute Systems Inc., 1-800-776-6060 312-346-3770 http://www.resolutesystems.com/ or ADR Systems 312-960-2260 http://www.adrsystems.com/ to set us a private arbitration. Our terms of use allows the parties to resolve any controversy quickly and inexpensively through mediation and/or private arbitration. Through mediation and/or private arbitration the dispute that Zeller have raised can be fully resolved with 30 days or sooner.
If Zeller attempts to file suit in any court, Stoller will move to have the case transferred to arbitration pursuant to the terms of use of the blog.
Most Cordially,
Leo Stoller
On Friday and Saturday, this famous Public Figure Mr. Michael T. Zeller .http://www.quinnemanuel.com/attorneys/bioPage.aspx?recid=101 has threatened to sue in Federal Court Leo Stoller for defamation regarding content that Mr. Zeller found objectionable on the Leo Stoller Blog. www.rentmark.blogspot.com/ Leo Stoller emailed Mr. Zeller the following response on Sunday to Mr. Zeller threat to sue Stoller in Federal Court.
"The correct forum for your alleged controversy with the content of the Leo Stoller blog pursuant to the terms of use published at http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2006/06/terms-of-use_08.html and previously emailed to you on many occasions is as follows:"
"If a dispute arises under this agreement, we agree to first try to resolve it with the help of a mutually agreed-upon mediator in the following location: Chicago. Any costs and fees other than attorney fees associated with the mediation and/or arbitration will be born by the moving party. If it proves impossible to arrive at a mutually satisfactory solution through mediation, we agree to submit the dispute to binding arbitration at the following location: Chicago, Illinois under the rules of the American Arbitration Association http://www.adr.org/. Judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitration may be entered in any court with jurisdiction to do so."
I suggest that you can contact JAMS, The Resolution Experts 312-655-0555 http://www.jamsadr.com/or Resolute Systems Inc., 1-800-776-6060 312-346-3770 http://www.resolutesystems.com/ or ADR Systems 312-960-2260 http://www.adrsystems.com/ to set us a private arbitration. Our terms of use allows the parties to resolve any controversy quickly and inexpensively through mediation and/or private arbitration. Through mediation and/or private arbitration the dispute that Zeller have raised can be fully resolved with 30 days or sooner.
If Zeller attempts to file suit in any court, Stoller will move to have the case transferred to arbitration pursuant to the terms of use of the blog.
Most Cordially,
Leo Stoller
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/
Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, Intelluctal Property surveillence, appeal drafting to legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, Intelluctal Property surveillence, appeal drafting to legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
MICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ, A PUBLIC FIGURE: CHARGES LEO STOLLER WITH THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW
MICHAEL T. ZELLER Esq., a public figure who works for Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP:Zeller has been frequently named as one of California's top intellectual property litigators, including in surveys of attorneys published by Los Angeles Magazine and California Lawyer Magazine.Education University of Iowa (J.D., with high honors, 1989) Iowa Law Review: Editor in Chief Order of the Coif Van Oosterhout Honors Moot Court University of Iowa (B.A., with honors, 1986)
Click here to download a printable version.
Mr. Michael T. Zeller http://www.quinnemanuel.com/attorneys/bioPage.aspx?recid=101
threatened to sue Leo Stoller and Sent the following threatening email to Stoller on Saturday March 17, 2007:
"Mr. Stoller, you have failed to comply with my request and you will be sued as a result. I have no doubt that a court will find your strained effort to explain away what is only the latest in your defamatory statements and other illegal conduct targeting me to be as unpersuasive as the federal courts have uniformly found your other positions over the years. Not only have you been sanctioned time and time again for your frivolous contentions and suits, but you have been adjudged to be a vexatious litigant by a federal court. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board surely put it best when it stated that "[t]he lack of credibility of Mr. Stoller is a matter of public record."
You also ignore that you presented to Judge Kendall the same groundless arguments that form the supposed basis for your ARDC http://www.iardc.org/ complaint and you lost. Indeed, she rebuked you for your previous filing of a bogus criminal complaint against me and others. Nor are your latest threats of yet another meritless disciplinary complaint of any moment. They are only the latest in your pattern of making groundless allegations against judges, attorneys and clients as part of your efforts to extort and harass. Not one of them has ever been found to have merit.
What might be of interest to the ARDC is the evidence of your unauthorized practice of law. As you know, in his ruling that you committed bankruptcy fraud, Judge Schmetterer noted that you have purported to offer legal services even though you are not a lawyer. Your commercial web site is likewise replete with offerings to perform attorney services such as brief writing.
As for your now repeated threats against me over the supposed terms of use, including your prior allegations of copyright infringement for using your own statements against you as evidence in legal proceedings, I have addressed those previously, and your response here adds nothing new. If you do not withdraw them in writing by the start of business on Monday Central time, the legal action will include claims against you for those as well," wrote Michael T. Zeller Esq.
You also ignore that you presented to Judge Kendall the same groundless arguments that form the supposed basis for your ARDC http://www.iardc.org/ complaint and you lost. Indeed, she rebuked you for your previous filing of a bogus criminal complaint against me and others. Nor are your latest threats of yet another meritless disciplinary complaint of any moment. They are only the latest in your pattern of making groundless allegations against judges, attorneys and clients as part of your efforts to extort and harass. Not one of them has ever been found to have merit.
What might be of interest to the ARDC is the evidence of your unauthorized practice of law. As you know, in his ruling that you committed bankruptcy fraud, Judge Schmetterer noted that you have purported to offer legal services even though you are not a lawyer. Your commercial web site is likewise replete with offerings to perform attorney services such as brief writing.
As for your now repeated threats against me over the supposed terms of use, including your prior allegations of copyright infringement for using your own statements against you as evidence in legal proceedings, I have addressed those previously, and your response here adds nothing new. If you do not withdraw them in writing by the start of business on Monday Central time, the legal action will include claims against you for those as well," wrote Michael T. Zeller Esq.
Leo Stoller is a legal ethics and trademark experts who provides trial testimony, Trademark valuations, trademark services, trademark surveillance, appeal drafting to legal professionals. ldms4@hotmail.com/
MICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ DECLARATION OF WAR ON LEO STOLLER!
CHICAGO--MICHAEL T. ZELLER DECLARATION OF WAR ON LEO STOLLER;
EMAIL SENT TO LEO STOLLER From: "Michael T Zeller" mailto:michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com: "WILLIAM BARRETT" <mailto:WILLIAM.BARRETT@bfkpn.com ROBINSON" >><Kim.Robinson@bfkpn.com>>>
Subject: Demand for removal and retraction of defamatory material>>Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:43:51 -0700 The attached letter is being faxed to you as well. Should you fail >>to>>comply with the letter's demands by the deadline tonight, we will >>file>>suit against you and move for an injunction to compel you to do so. Michael T. Zeller, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP>>865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor>>Los Angeles, CA 90017>>Direct: (213) 443-3180>>Main Phone: (213) 443-3000>>Main Fax: (213) 443-3100>>E-mail: michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com>> WWW.quinnemanuel.com>
LEO STOLLER'S RESPONSE:
Att: Mr. Michael T. Zeller, Mr. Barrett and Ms. Robinson:
You and your firm(s) have been put on notice previously that you have violated the terms of use of Leo Stoller's blog and have been banned from any use there of. See attached term of use of the Leo Stoller blog that have been previously sent to you. http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2006/06/terms-of-use_08.html
Without waiving the fact that you and your firm have engaged in a pattern of unauthorized visits to my blog, notwithstanding the fact that I have banned you and your firm(s) from visiting my blog as well known to you, I will address your misdirected and false allegation(s) that represents your Defamation charge. You are complaining that I have defamed you and your firm(s), William Barrett Esq., and Kim Robinson Esq., by writing on my blog:
"Last night, you began making the following claim on your commercial web site:
The Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois "These repeated claims that the ARDC has opened an investigation are wholly false, as you know." "We expect you to immediately (a) remove these false factual claims about the ARDC from your site..." "Should you fail to comply with the forgoing demand by 8:PM Central Time (March 16, 2007), we will file legal action against you for defamation and other claims in federal court".
Mr. Zeller, your alleged Defamation claim as you know is frivolous. There is no Defamation claim to the truth http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-defamation.php. http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/libel_claim_defenses.htm ARDC http://www.iardc.org/ has opened an investigation in my attorney disciplinary charge that I filed against you, Mr. Barrett and Ms. Robinson with the ARDC. See attached letter from the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois dated March 13, 2007 from ARDC Counsel Ms Myrrha B. Guzman. Click http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/michael-t-zeller-threatens-to-sue.html
These alleged false charge(s) of Defamation by you and Mr. Barrett and Ms. Robinson and your respective law firms: are merely another attempt to remove the attorney disciplinary charge(s) and my disciplinary complaint to the Federal Court. This is an identical tactic that you employed after I filed at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) a Motion for Summary Judgment against Google Inc., trademark Google for cancelation of the grounds that the 'term' Google is now in the dictionary http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google for the goods covered under your client's Registration with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and you in exchange filed a frivilous Civil Rico Action http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/will-judge-virginia-kendell-allow.html in the Federal Court against my corporations and you excluded me from the suit, all of which, in order to avoid having to respond to my Motion for Summary Judgment at the TTAB. It is obvious why you make over $6400.00 a day doing what you do (Over $1.6 million a year).
If you file a frivolous Defamation lawsuit against me I will seek Rule 11 sanctions http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm, against you, Mr. Barrett and Ms Robinson and your respective firms. In addition failure to include in your complaint my response to your letter of March 16, 2007, a copy of the attached ARDC letter of ARDC Counsel Myrrha B. Guzman and a copy of the attached terms of use, will result in an immediate Request to Dismiss you suit for misrepresentation on the court and additional ARDC violations of Rule 3.3(a). http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html
Most Cordially,
/Leo Stoller/
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/
Subject: Demand for removal and retraction of defamatory material>>Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:43:51 -0700 The attached letter is being faxed to you as well. Should you fail >>to>>comply with the letter's demands by the deadline tonight, we will >>file>>suit against you and move for an injunction to compel you to do so. Michael T. Zeller, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP>>865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor>>Los Angeles, CA 90017>>Direct: (213) 443-3180>>Main Phone: (213) 443-3000>>Main Fax: (213) 443-3100>>E-mail: michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com>> WWW.quinnemanuel.com>
LEO STOLLER'S RESPONSE:
Att: Mr. Michael T. Zeller, Mr. Barrett and Ms. Robinson:
You and your firm(s) have been put on notice previously that you have violated the terms of use of Leo Stoller's blog and have been banned from any use there of. See attached term of use of the Leo Stoller blog that have been previously sent to you. http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2006/06/terms-of-use_08.html
Without waiving the fact that you and your firm have engaged in a pattern of unauthorized visits to my blog, notwithstanding the fact that I have banned you and your firm(s) from visiting my blog as well known to you, I will address your misdirected and false allegation(s) that represents your Defamation charge. You are complaining that I have defamed you and your firm(s), William Barrett Esq., and Kim Robinson Esq., by writing on my blog:
"Last night, you began making the following claim on your commercial web site:
The Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois "These repeated claims that the ARDC has opened an investigation are wholly false, as you know." "We expect you to immediately (a) remove these false factual claims about the ARDC from your site..." "Should you fail to comply with the forgoing demand by 8:PM Central Time (March 16, 2007), we will file legal action against you for defamation and other claims in federal court".
Mr. Zeller, your alleged Defamation claim as you know is frivolous. There is no Defamation claim to the truth http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-defamation.php. http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/libel_claim_defenses.htm ARDC http://www.iardc.org/ has opened an investigation in my attorney disciplinary charge that I filed against you, Mr. Barrett and Ms. Robinson with the ARDC. See attached letter from the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois dated March 13, 2007 from ARDC Counsel Ms Myrrha B. Guzman. Click http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/michael-t-zeller-threatens-to-sue.html
These alleged false charge(s) of Defamation by you and Mr. Barrett and Ms. Robinson and your respective law firms: are merely another attempt to remove the attorney disciplinary charge(s) and my disciplinary complaint to the Federal Court. This is an identical tactic that you employed after I filed at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) a Motion for Summary Judgment against Google Inc., trademark Google for cancelation of the grounds that the 'term' Google is now in the dictionary http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google for the goods covered under your client's Registration with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and you in exchange filed a frivilous Civil Rico Action http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2007/03/will-judge-virginia-kendell-allow.html in the Federal Court against my corporations and you excluded me from the suit, all of which, in order to avoid having to respond to my Motion for Summary Judgment at the TTAB. It is obvious why you make over $6400.00 a day doing what you do (Over $1.6 million a year).
If you file a frivolous Defamation lawsuit against me I will seek Rule 11 sanctions http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm, against you, Mr. Barrett and Ms Robinson and your respective firms. In addition failure to include in your complaint my response to your letter of March 16, 2007, a copy of the attached ARDC letter of ARDC Counsel Myrrha B. Guzman and a copy of the attached terms of use, will result in an immediate Request to Dismiss you suit for misrepresentation on the court and additional ARDC violations of Rule 3.3(a). http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html
Most Cordially,
/Leo Stoller/
http://rentmark.blogspot.com/
MICHAEL T. ZELLER THREATENS TO SUE STOLLER FOR DEFAMATION BECAUSE THE ARDC HAS NOT OPENED AN INVESTIGATION AGAINST ZELLER?--- YOU BE THE JUDGE!
MICHAEL T. ZELLER HAS THREATENED TO SUE STOLLER FOR DEFAMATION FOR PUBLISHING THE FACT THAT THE ARDC http://www.iardc.org/HAS OPENED AN INVESTIGATION INTO MICHAEL T. ZELLER No. 07 CI 1125, William John Barrett No. 07 CI 1126 and Kimberly J. Robinson Case No. 07 CI 1127. Myrrha B. Guzman ARDC Counsel in a letter dated March 13, 2007 wrote, "We have received your communication regarding Michael T. Zeller, William J. Barrett and Kimberly Fidler Robinson. We will require that the attorneys submit responses to the matters you have raised. Copies of the attorneys' responses may be sent to you for your comments. We will then determine whether further investigation is warranted."
Signed MYRRHA B. GUZMAN Counsel
Michael T. Zeller in his threatening March 16, 2007 letter published above claims, "These repeated claims that the ARDC has opened an investigation are wholly false, as you know. Your frivolous complaint to the ARDC is neither an action of the ARDC nor the opening of an ARDC investigation".
The question for the court to decide in Zeller defamation lawsuit will be whether ARDC Counsel Myrrh B. Guzman March 13, 2007 letter to Leo Stoller, after receiving his attorney misconduct complaint "represents the Opening of an ARDC investigation?"
The best defense against a defamation lawsuit is the "truth"! ARDC has opened an investigation into Zeller Case No. 07 CI 1125, Barrett Case No. 07 CI 1126 and Robinson Case No. CI 1127 that is a indisputable fact.
Under the circumstances for Mr. Zeller to allege in a frivolous defamation suit against Stoller that the ARDC has not opened an investigation against him will subject Mr. Zeller et al., to additional charges of violating the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct 3.3(a) http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html Leo Stoller is a legal ethics expert ldms4@hotmail.com/ for over 25 years who has advocated the stick enforcement of attorney ethics. Stoller has appeared on CBS, Fox News and numerous radio talk shows as an advocate for the "stick enforcement of attorney ethics and the report of attorneys who violate those ethics to their local disciplinary commissions, as was the case at bar.
AEAE: DUTY TO REPORT PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT
CHICAGO--AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) a group that has advocated for over 25 years the stick enforcement of legal ethics advocates reporting professional misconduct in order to enhance the public image of the legal profession. Secondly to rude out corrupt practitioners who bring the legal professional in disrepute. Unless a party who is a victim of attorney misconduct, reports professional misconduct when ever it rears its ugly head, it has a corrosive effect and grows like a cancer on the legal professional. Professional misconduct is defined as a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct Click here to see the rules: http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html For a listing of all of the state disciplinary commissions click here http://www.abanet.org/cpr/regulation/scpd/disciplinary.html
Leo Stoller is the founder and Executive Director of AEAE for over 25 years and has been dubbed the "Ralph Nader" of attorney disciplinary. Stoller is the nations leading ethics expert who has appeared on CBS, Fox News, in national news papers and on talk radio, as spokesman for AEAE. The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics will provide procedural information on How to file and Plead a valid disciplinary "cause of action" against an attorney who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct. ldms4@hotmail.com "Help stamp out professional misconduct by reporting it to your state disciplinary commission today."
Leo Stoller is the founder and Executive Director of AEAE for over 25 years and has been dubbed the "Ralph Nader" of attorney disciplinary. Stoller is the nations leading ethics expert who has appeared on CBS, Fox News, in national news papers and on talk radio, as spokesman for AEAE. The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics will provide procedural information on How to file and Plead a valid disciplinary "cause of action" against an attorney who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct. ldms4@hotmail.com "Help stamp out professional misconduct by reporting it to your state disciplinary commission today."
Sunday, March 18, 2007
WE ALL SAW PATRICA, WE DID SHE IS AT THE WINDOW...
ELMWOOD PARK--WE ARE ALL HAPPY to report that Patricia is alive and well. She has been spoted at a window in Elmwood Park throwing money out of it...Since June 6, 2005 Patricia has thrown every penny that Betty, Earnie and May gave her....Patricia has not earned a "dime" since June 6, 2005...every penny that she made since then she also throw out of the window....Patricia is not going to stop throwing money out of the window until there is nothing left....But Patricia tells us that she is winning....We are going to watch her until it is all gone..."What is it like working every week-end for Free?" Joe Pie
