PFIZER WINS PATENT DISPUTE AGAINST GENERIC DRUG MAKER
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
PFIZER WINS PATENT DISPUTE AGAINST GENERIC DRUG MAKER
PENSYLVANIA-PFIZER WINS PATENT DISPUTE against generic drug maker Mylan Laboratories. The Judge in the case Terrence F. McVerry from the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of Pfizer. Pfizer Inc.'s patent covered its hypertension drug, Norvasc. Leo Stoller is a nationally known Intellectual property expert who provides trial testimony, IP valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, IP survellience, brief drafting to legal professionals. Constact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
HARRY POTTER ISSUED INJUNCTION AGAINST eBAY
INDIA--A court issued an injunction to the richest woman in the world, J.K. Rowlings, the creator of Harry Potter series, stopping an Indian company from selling illegal copies of Ms. Rowlings books on eBay. Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert, who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, IP surveillance, brief writing etc. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Monday, February 26, 2007
OSCAR TRADEMARK APPLICATION REJECTED ON THE GROUNDS OF IMMORAL OR SCANDALOUS MATERIAL
HOLLYWOOD--COMMENTARY--THE OSCARS WERE FOR MANY YEARS THE SUPER BOWL OF HOLLYWOOD. It has now degenerated into a cess pool of moral decadence and is no longer worth watching. Last year the big film Broke Back Mountain was based upon the glorification of a homo sexual relationship involving cow boys. John Wayne and Gary Cooper were turning in their graves. This year the Oscars is being hosted by an open and notorious lesbian Ellen Degenerate. Bob Hope and Johnny Carson are spinning in their graves. Where are the movies like Casablanca, It's a Wonderful Life, the African Queen, High Noon, the Ten Commandments? Where are the movie stars like Humphrey Bogard, James Cagney, James Stewart, Henry Fonda, Gary Cooper, Bette Davis and Katharine Hepburn? This year we have as an Oscar Nominee Mark Wahlberg? A criminal who did not even graduate from high school. Today if the mark OSCAR or HOLLYWOOD were being applied for at the Patent and Trademark Office the said applications would be rejected on the grounds that "You can't get a trademark for immoral or scandalous material!"
Leo Stoller is a nationally known Trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, trademark survelience, appeal drafting to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
NIKE FAILS TO POLICE ITS MARK
CHICAGO--IN THE OPINION OF LEO STOLLER a nationally known trademark expert, Nike fails to police it's NIKE trademark. Nike is aware of a potential infringer NIKITA has been producing similar goods and marketing those goods under what can be argued as a confusing similar mark NIKITA and has done nothing about. When and if NIKE decides to move against NIKITA, NIKITA will be able to make a valid "laches" and "estoppel" argument against NIKE. STOLLER originally blogged the NIKE v. NIKITA infringement story on Dec. 04, 2006. NIKE is aware of NIKITA use of the said mark on similar goods and has done nothing about. Click here:http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2006/12/nike-v-nikita.html
Leo Stoller is a well known trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark surveillance, brief and appeal drafting. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/BIGGEST TRADEMARK STORY OF 07 GOOGLE'S TRADEMARK CANCELED?
CHICAGO--There is no question that the biggest trademark story for the year 2007 will be the cancellation of the Google Inc., trademark for becoming "generic" and/or descriptive. The google term is in the dictionary http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google for the services covered under its Federal trademark Registration and is no longer entitled to Federal Trademark Protection and/or Federal Trademark Registration. This story also has legs because of Google Inc., over reaction to this inevitable faith by counter suing Leo Stoller's companies for a frivolous Civil Rico Action. But not even including Leo Stoller individually in Google's phony cause of action. This story has attracted nation media attention with 
numerous stories being written about this controversy all over the net. Click here to read the latest story Google Vs. Vexatious Balls by a famous writer Mr. Jason Lee Miller http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/02/23/google-vs-vexatious-balls
numerous stories being written about this controversy all over the net. Click here to read the latest story Google Vs. Vexatious Balls by a famous writer Mr. Jason Lee Miller http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/02/23/google-vs-vexatious-ballsLeo Stoller is a nationally known Trademark Expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, brief and appeal drafting contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
YOUTUBE AGREES BLOCK COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL
CHICAGO--YOUTUBE has reportedly agreed to use a video-filtering system that will block video clips containing copyrighted materials. YOUTUBE has been charged with permitting copyrighted material to be posted to its web site. YOUTUBE has agreed to use technology, which would allow the site to scan video clips to look for unique digital fingerprints and compare them with the ones that are copyrighted. 
Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert, in copyrights, patents and trademarks. Stoller provides expert witness testimony, damage reports, surveys, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert, in copyrights, patents and trademarks. Stoller provides expert witness testimony, damage reports, surveys, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/CANON BREACHED LICENSE AGREEMENT
DALLAS--Judge Samuel Sparks said Canon had breached the 1999 license with Nano, formerly SI Diamond Technologies. Cannon Flat Screen business will suffer. A judge
has decided that Nano-Proprietary can terminate its licensing agreement with Canon Inc. over technology for flat screen televisions. Leo Stoller is a intellectual property expert who provides trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals.
has decided that Nano-Proprietary can terminate its licensing agreement with Canon Inc. over technology for flat screen televisions. Leo Stoller is a intellectual property expert who provides trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals.Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Friday, February 23, 2007
MICROSOFT ORDERED TO PAY $1.5 BILLION, LOSES PATENT CASE
.jpg)
CALIFORNIA--MICROSOFT CORP WAS ORDERED TO PAY $1.5 BILLION DOLLARS TO Alcate-Lucent for infringing two of their patents. The jury found that that Microsoft’s Windows Media Player infringed on two patents held by Alcatel-Lucent. This is the largest award ever ordered for patent infringement.
Leo Stoller is a intellectual property expert who provides trial testimony, IP valuations, surveys, damage reports, appeal drafting for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com
Thursday, February 22, 2007
EARTHLINK WINS PATENT INFRINGMENT LAWSUIT
New York (February 21, 2007)-- EarthLink Inc., wins patent infringement lawsuit against Inline Connection Corp. A federal jury has ruled that patents asserted against the Internet service provider by Inline Connection Corp. are canceled and not infringed. The decesion recently came down in Delaware District Court in Wilmington. In 2002 Inline had sued EarthLink and Time Warner Inc. with separate patent infringement. A patent attorney who was following this case said, "When a company who owns a patent chooses to sue an infringer there is always the possiblity that the companies patents will be held invalid as in the case at bar." Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert who provides expert witness testimony, IP valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing for legal professiionals. contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
MICHAEL T. ZELLER CHARGED BY STOLLER WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT
CHICAGO-LEO STOLLER THE DIRECTOR OF AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS, A NATIONALLY KNOWN GROUP THAT ADVOCATES the strick enforcement of Attorney ethics has charged Michael T. Zeller with making misstatements of material fact to a tribunal and violating Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Rule 3.3(a). Stoller alleges that Michael T. Zeller filed a motion to lift Stay in front of Judge Jack B. Schmetterer alleging that Leo Stoller was a necessary party to a Civil Rico Federal Lawsuit and requesting that a stay be lifted. After Judge Schmetterer lifted the stay. Michael T. Zeller filed a Civil Rico action on behalf of Google Inc., against Stoller's companies Central Mfg Inc., and Stealth Industries, Inc. and not Stoller. Mr. Zeller in front of Judge Virigina M. Kendall plead that Stoller was not a necessary party. Not only was Mr. Zeller barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel from make the assertion that Stoller was not a necessary party in front of Judge Kendall, after Mr. Zeller succeeded in arguing in front of Judge Schmetterer that Stoller was a necessary party, Mr. Zeller is alleged to have violated 3.3(a) making a misstatement of material fact and/or law to a Tribunal. Disclaimer---It should be noted that Stoller's allegation of professional misconduct against Mr. Zeller is only an allegation. Mr. Zeller is entitled to a hearing and to be proven guilty of misconduct beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. Mr. Zeller is presumed innocent of any Professional Misconduct until proven guilty.
Leo Stoller is a nationally known legal ethics expert and trademark expert. Stoller provides Trademark valuations, Expert witness testimony, trademark services. Stoller can be contacted at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDALL REFUSES TO ENTER GOOGLE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
CHICAGO--GOOGLE INC., filed a civil action against Central Mfg Co., and Stealth Industries, Inc., in retaliation for Leo Stoller filing a Petition to Cancel Google Inc's trademark "Google". Stoller filed the Petition to Cancel at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on the grounds that the Google mark has become generic and/or descriptive of the services listed in its trademark application. The term google is now in the dictionary and the definition of which covers the services listed under the Google Inc., trademark Registration. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google
Google Inc., in court today was attempting to have Judge Virginia M. Kendell confirm a frivolous settlement reached with the trustee Richard Fogel allowing a default Rico Judgment to be entered against Central Mfg Co. and Stealth Industries, Inc. Google Inc., did not sue Leo Stoller a necessary party. Stoller moved to intervene. Judge Kendel said she "would not rule on the settlement until I rule on Stoller's motion to intervene". Google Inc's Attorney Michael Zeller in his motion to lift a stay indicated that Stoller was a necessary party. However, Mr. Zeller in his Motion for Settlement stated that Leo Stoller was not a necessary party to the Google Civil Action. Mr. Zeller's double speak is subject to Judicial Estoppel. Zeller cannot argue that Stoller is a necessary party in his Motion for the Stay before Judge Jack B. Schmetterer. Then argue before Judge Virginia M. Kendall that "Stoller was not a necessary party." However this is exactly what Zeller has done in violation of ARDC Rule 3.3(a). Judge Kendall set her ruling for the end of March. Judge Schmetterer lifted the stay. There is no reason why the TTAB should not have ruled on Stoller's pending motion for summary judgment. Stay tuned here for all of the updates on this years most exciting trademark controversy "The termination of the Google generic trademark and Google's fight to save their "generic" trademark from the inevitable cancellation by the TTAB". This story has all of the drama of a major motion picture...100 billion dollar company, multi million dollars lawyers...against Leo Stoller....David and Goliath...now playing....
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trial testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, brief and appeal drafting to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
JUDGE KENDAL TO DECIDE 6 MOTIONS IN GOOGLE CASE TODAY
CHICAGO--JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDALL, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE to decide 6 motions in the Civil Rico Action filed by Google Inc., against Central Mfg Co., and Stealth Industries, Inc. Leo Stoller filed a petition to cancel the Google trademark Registration on the grounds that it has become "generic" and/or "descriptive" of the services listed in Google Inc.'s Federal Trademark Registration. In addition, the Google mark is listed now in several dictionaries, the meaning of which clearly establishes that the term 'google' is generic. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google Google Inc., in retaliation has filed a civil Rico Action against Stoller's corporations. Stoller has moved to intervene in the action in order to establish the frivolous nature of the said civil Rico Action....to be continued....Leo Stoller is a nationally known trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing to legal professional. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
INTEL SUES INDIAN COMPANY FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT
NEW DELHI--A New Delhi High Court today injoined a local Indian company from using Intel Corporation's registered trademark 'Intel'. Judge Gita Mittal said: "I pass a decree restraining the defendent (Intel Info Service) from conducting any business using Intel as a trade name or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff's (Intel) registered mark under Intel." Judge Mittal said that "Intel has failed to place evidence and material before it whereon it could be held to be entitled to compensatory damage." Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/Monday, February 19, 2007
STARBUCKS v. CHARBUCKS TRADEMARK CONTROVERSY RAGES ON
NEW YORK--The Second Circuit ruled against Starbucks Corp permitting Starbucks to continue its suit against a New Hampshire coffee company who was using the mark CHARBUCKS on coffee.
"We will take legal steps to prevent marketplace confusion and to protect the value of our trademark from infringement and dilution when we are unable to resolve a matter through alternate means," Starbucks spokesperson Alan Hilowitz said. Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark trial testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
BIN LADEN APPROVES USE OF HIS NAME FOR U.S. TRADEMARK
WASHINGTON--The U.S Patent and Trademark Office had rejected a trademark application for the mark OBAMA BIN LADEN. On the grounds that the name "may falsely suggest a connection with the individuals Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama," according to examining attorney Karen Bush. "You can't get a trademark for immoral or scandalous material. The Sept 11, terrorist attacks have caused the name bin Laden to become synomymous with the acts themselves." Bush said, "the names Obama and Osama clearly refer to the Democratic senator from Illinois and the terrorist ben Laden and that the applicant must submit consent from the two individuals authorizing the applicant to register their names." According to a report from Al Jazeera, Osama bin Laden, having heard the story about the U.S. trademark Application for the mark OBAMA BIN LADEN in the tribal area Waziristan where he is hiding in a cave in Pakistan. Bin Laden has stated today that he "would be proud to give his permission for the use of his name with a brother Muslim Barack Obama for use on the trademark OBAMA BIN LADEN."
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
OBAMA BIN LADEN TRADEMARK APPLICATION REJECTED
WASHINGTON--A trademark Application for the mark Obama bin Laden was rejected on the grounds that it made a false connections between Osama bin Laden and U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, and contained "immoral or scandalous matter," according to Karen Bush, an Examining Attorney at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The Illinois senator is attempting to become the first African-American Muslim to be elected president. According to Al Jazeera, Osama bin Laden would rather see Barack Obama elected President than John McCane.
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Saturday, February 17, 2007
Friday, February 16, 2007
LEO STOLLER APPEALS JUDGES DECISION DENYING HIS MOTION
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER FILES AN APPEAL OF JUDGE JACK B. SCHMETTERER DECISION denying his motion for permission to retain counsel to represent his corporations in a Civil Action brought by Google Inc. Despite the fact that Stoller had argued that the Trustee had abandoned his interest in various corporations and their assets, Judge Schmetterer denied Stoller motion. An Appeal was immediately filed and Stoller is confident of reversal on due process and equal protection grounds.
In the business of presenting arguments to an arbitrator, the movant should never take a "no" answer, when there are others who could hear your case who are empowered to say "yes", like the appeals court. Stoller trademark slogan is "UNTIL THE LAST COURT SPEAKS!"
In the business of presenting arguments to an arbitrator, the movant should never take a "no" answer, when there are others who could hear your case who are empowered to say "yes", like the appeals court. Stoller trademark slogan is "UNTIL THE LAST COURT SPEAKS!"
Leo Stoller is a trademark litigation expert who provides trial testimony, damage reports, trademark valuations, appeal drafting etc., contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/ In the Pure Fishing Case Stoller has moved the appeals court for reconsideration of their dwp decision. "UNTIL THE LAST COURT SPEAKS!"
Thursday, February 15, 2007
HELLO IT WAS NICE TO SEE YOUR FACE AGAIN
HELLO IS WAS NICE TO SEE YOUR BEAUTIFUL SMILING FACE AGAIN. "Just one look that all it took". See you anon...FACE...
AEJE SUPPORT FEDERAL JUDGE PAY RAISE
CHICAGO--At a recent meeting of the Americans for the Enforcment of Judicial Ethics AEJE, the Executive Director Leo Stoller urged support for a pay raise for federal judges. Judges ($165,200) should earn more than the starting annual salaries of first-year lawyers $160,000. The income made by experienced lawyers is much more. For example, Michael Zeller a trademark attorney it is reported earns in just one year 1.6 million dollars. It would take a district court judge at their current salary to work 10 years to earn what Zeller earns in just one year. In three years Michael Zeller rakes in more money than a district court judge earns by working 30 years.
Leo Stoller is a intellectual property expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Leo Stoller is a intellectual property expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
HOUSE PASSED A BILL TO TRAIN JUDGES IN PATENT LAW ISSUES
WASHINGTON--The House has now passed the bill allowing for this education regime for new judges who will be trained on patent issues. The bill also provides for "specially appointed clerks with patent expertise." According to a Patent attorney "this will make it easer for judges who are trained to make more informed decisions on patent issues. The field of patent law requires specially trained judges and clerks." Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert who provides trademark valuations, IP valuations, expert witness testimony, trademark services, brief writing. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
ASIA PRODUCING MORE PATENTS
ASIA--THE WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION has preported for the the third consecutive year, Korea, China and Japan have outshone the West with record growth in patent applications. The inventors from Asia are creating more patents than ever before, representing over a quarter of all international filings under the U.N. body’s Patent Cooperation Treaty. Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert who provides expert witness testimony, IP valuations, trademark surveys, damage reports, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Monday, February 12, 2007
Federal Circuit Affirms TTAB denial Of Bose Trademark Application
WASHINGTON--The Federal Circuit has denied the Appeal of speaker maker Bose Corp. to reverse the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's decision to deny its BOSE trademark application. The decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled the TTAB " correctly denied the mark through the doctrine of res judicata, because it was essentially the same as another Bose mark it..." Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark valuations, expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, expert witness testimony, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
SANOFI-AVENTIS PATENT FOR LOVENOX RULED UNEFORCEABLE
NEW YORK-Sanofi-Aventis patent for Lovenox is no good. "Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer ruled Thursday that Sanofi-Aventis’ patent for Lovenox was unenforceable because the drug maker intended to deceive the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office during its patent application." It now has become very difficult for Sanofi-Aventis to prevent a generic version of its popular anti-clotting drug Lovenox, from coming on the market. A patent attorney stated that "this case evidences just how difficult it is to properly obtain a patent and then attempt to enforce it. The attack on Patent Trolls by the Supreme Court in their recent decisions is totally unjustified."
Leo Stoller is an intellectual property expert who provides IP evaluations, expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
RESEARCH IN MOTION PREVALS IN TRADEMARK DISPUTE OVER SAMSUNG
NEW YORK--RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD (RIM) IS CREDITED with protecting it well known Blackberry trademark. In December RIM sued Samsung Electornics Co. click http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2006/12/research-in-motion-ltd-sues-samsung.html A settlement was reached in BlackBerry-BlackJack trademark dispute- over Samsung's new ``BlackJack'' smart phone. RIM said in a statement that the settlement of the lawsuit it filed in December includes ``immediate provisions for the protection of RIM's valuable trademarks limitations on use of the Blackjack trademark, withdrawal of the trademark application for Blackjack. Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
HOW EVIL ARE YOU?
Evil refers to the morally objectionable aspects of your behavor penchant for destruction. Evil is defined as the absence of a good which could and should be present; the absence of which is a void in what should be. Evil is used to describe your acts, thoughts, and ideas which are thought to (either directly or causally) bring about affliction and death — the opposite of goodness, which itself refers to aspects which are life-affirming, peaceful, and constructive. Evil is best represented by you in the form of your unprovoked hatred against and coupled with an aggressive impulse to cause harm. Your hatred is aroused from within, through jealousy, wrong teachings or due to unexplained extra-personal forces.
How evil are you?
CHICAGO VALINTINE'S DAY STORY--FROM ONE PRISON TO ANOTHER PRISON
CHICAGO--A Patent Attorney was attempting to go out with a beautiful woman who continued to reject him by telling him "you're not my type!" The Patent Attorney would reply, "What you don't like Brad Pitt?" The Attorney was tired of the rejection, he hired someone to throw battery acid in the face of his girl friend, blinding her. The attorney was sentenced to fifteen years in prison. After he was recently released, he married his "blind" girlfriend. When asked by a reporter why she would marry some one who blinded her, his bride replied, "At least now I don't have to look at his face."
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Friday, February 09, 2007
EVIL ONE YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE
Deliverance from the Evil One. Through knowledge the righteous shall be delivered we are involved in spiritual battle whether we like it or not. We are involved in close combat - wrestling - not combat from a distance only. God permitted Satan to come close and at times permits dark powers, the Evil one, to come close to us. For which we paid a big penalty...
We are at times not even going to be aware of the Evil One's presence. In the midst of temptation and possibly oppression, we must resist and trust God for deliverance from the Evil One. There is a struggle that we must personally be involved in - against the Evil One. The Evil One has demonic powers, the evil one possess, and seeks to influence our minds, wills and emotions against God and His will. To be effective in prayer and spiritual warfare we must deny ourselves and persist in resisting the Evil one.
We are at times not even going to be aware of the Evil One's presence. In the midst of temptation and possibly oppression, we must resist and trust God for deliverance from the Evil One. There is a struggle that we must personally be involved in - against the Evil One. The Evil One has demonic powers, the evil one possess, and seeks to influence our minds, wills and emotions against God and His will. To be effective in prayer and spiritual warfare we must deny ourselves and persist in resisting the Evil one.
ANNA NICOLE SMITH DEAD AT 39
HOLLYWOOD, Fla. -- Anna Nicole Smith, the pneumatic blonde who was in the process of obtaining a trademark on her name for a line of perfume and jeans, died Thursday Anna Nicole 6:14 PM EST after collapsing at a hotel. She was 39. Ms. Smith "life played out as an extraordinary tabloid tale — Playboy centerfold, jeans model, bride of an octogenarian oil tycoon, reality-show subject, tragic mother". Leo Stoller sends his condolences to Ms. Smith family...Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Thursday, February 08, 2007
STOLLER ON BLOGGING AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
CHICAGO--EVERYONE THAT WRITES A BLOG ARE EXPOSING THEM SELVES TO LEGAL RISKS. Are bloggers entitled to the same rights as paid journalists? Does the First Amendment, Freedom of speech apply to bloggers? District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell wrote in American Civil Liberties union v. Reno, a leading internet free-speech case that the internet was "the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed". Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one's opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment. Bloggers can be liable for defamation which is the publication, with a certain state of mind, of false information that causes harm. The best defense for bloggers is the "truth". The truth will always defeat a "defamation" claim.
Bloggers are Journalists protected by the First Amendment which states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Leo Stoller is a blogger, a legal ethics expert and nationally known trademark expert who provides trial testimony, Intellectual property evaluations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Bloggers are Journalists protected by the First Amendment which states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Leo Stoller is a blogger, a legal ethics expert and nationally known trademark expert who provides trial testimony, Intellectual property evaluations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN G. ROBERTS SPEAKS IN CHICAGO
CHICAGO--CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN G. ROBERTS JR., SPOKE AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY. Justice Roberts says that he presides over "judges" court. For the first time all of the justices now on the U.S. Supreme Court have served on a federal appellate court before being named to the Supreme Court. A Patent lawyer interviewed who did not want to be named stated"a judges court may be the reason why the current members of the Supreme court know little about patent law." This court has lowered the bar to patent challenges. "Companies that agree to pay royalties to a patent holder can now challenge the patent's validity while still bound by the licensing agreement thanks to Justice Roberts judges court." "It might serve the public better not to have all "judges" judge every issue. Harriet Myers would have been a good justice in that she did not have any experience as a judge. We need to see more Harriet Myers type judges on the Supreme Court in the future, " said the patent attorney.
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides trademark testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDALL ALLOWS 14 DAYS GOOGLE INC., TO RESPOND TO STOLLER'S MOTIONS
CHICAGO--IN THE HEARING IN THE GOOGLE INC., CIVIL RICO ACTION in Chicago, Judge Virginia Kendal granted Google Inc., 14 days to respond to Leo Stoller's pending motions. Stoller was not named in Google Inc.,'s Federal Rico action against his companies and is seeking intervention in the case. Conspicuously absent from the court was Michael Zeller. Apparently he did not feel it was necessary to fly in from LA to make an appearance before Judge Kendal. The Judge allowed all of the parties to make their arguments and gave Google Inc., two weeks to file written responses to Stoller's motions. Today Stoller will be filling motions in three Federal Court Proceedings in Chicago, Illinois. Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing to legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Monday, February 05, 2007
JUDGE VIRGINIA M. KENDALL WILL HEAR 4 MOTIONS IN GOOGLE RICO AGAINST STOLLER ON MONDAY
CHICAGO-GOOGLE INC'S FEDERAL RICO CASE AGAINST STOLLER'S COMPANIES GOT OFF TO A FAST START. GOOGLE INC., just filed on January 19, 2007 against Central Mfg Co., and Stealth Industries, Inc. Google left Stoller out of the case, as he was not named. Despite the fact that Google Inc., filed several motions before Judge Jack B. Schmetterer to lift the stay in order to go after Stoller for Civil Rico. A case which has grown out of a petition to cancel proceeding filed by Stoller canceling Google's "generic" trademark at the Trademark Trial and Appeal board. It is obvious what Google Inc.,'s brilliant lead counsel the great Michael "Rico" Zeller was attempting to accomplish by leaving Stoller out of his complaint. Zeller was attempting to get a default judgment on civil Rico against Stoller's corporations and then Zeller planed to file another Rico action against Leo Stoller having a the said default judgment in his pocket.
The amazing "Rico" Zeller who is paid over $6400 per day (Over 1.6 million per year) to dream up legal theories of attack did not want to deal with Stoller in his first Rico Action. He wanted to argue to the next judge "how bad Stoller is" because his corporations were found guilty (by default) of Civil Rico when Zeller filed his next Civil Rico action, this time against Stoller. When money is no object, because for Google Inc., ($100 billion dollar capitalization) money is no object, Google hired the mighty "Rico" Zeller to attack Leo Stoller, the greatest Rico attorney of all times. It is reported that "Rico" Zeller will use every bit of Google's $100 billion if it is necessary "to take down Stoller!" Because it is reported that Zeller has stated that "here in America you get what ever justice you can afford." And if you have $100 billion you can afford a lot of justice!
The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall is the newest appointed federal judge in the Northern District of Illinois, is hearing the case.
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides damages reports, surveys, expert witness testimony, trademark services, legal research, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/ See you at the top!
The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall is the newest appointed federal judge in the Northern District of Illinois, is hearing the case.
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides damages reports, surveys, expert witness testimony, trademark services, legal research, brief writing for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/ See you at the top!
GOOGLE INC., REFUSES TO ANSWER LEO STOLLER' S SUMMERY JUDGMENT MOTION AFTER STAY WAS LIFTED
WASHINGTON--GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL ZELLER HAS FILED PLEADINGS WITH THE BOARD JANUARY 31, 2007 OBJECTING TO ANSWERING LEO STOLLER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PETITION TO CANCEL PROCEEDING 92045778. This is dispite the fact that Judge Jack B. Schmetterer issued an order, lifting the stay and providing for Google Inc., to answer Stoller's motion for summary judgment at the TTAB. Michael Zeller was not in Judge Jack B. Schmetterer's court room when Judge Schmetterer entered the order lifting the stay and included in his order on the request of Leo Stoller in open court that Google Inc., can now respond to Stoller's pending motion for summary judgment. Zeller argument that Stoller is a non party at the TTAB is a non sequitor. Is Michael Zeller suggesting that the Board disregard Judge Schmetter's order providing that Google Inc., answer Stoller's motion for summary judgment?
The fact that Judge Jack B. Schmetterer entered an order regarding Google Inc., lifting the stay and permiting Google Inc., to file its response to Stoller motion for summary judgment at the Board is reality. The Board should note that no where in Michael Zeller Registrant/Respondent Google Inc.'s objections and reponse to non-party Leo Stoller's purported filings does Michael Zeller provide the Board with a copy of Judge Jack Schmetterer's order. Zeller has attempted to conceal Judge Schmetterer's order from the Board. For which the Board should enter a default judgment against Google Inc., for its failure to respond to Stoller's motion for summary judgment after Judge Schmetterer lifted the stay and provided that Google Inc., do so.
Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, trademark services, brief writing for legals professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Friday, February 02, 2007
LEO STOLLER FILES TO INTERPLEAD IN GOOGLE RICO ACTION
CHICAGO--LEO STOLLER FILED A PETITION TO CANCEL THE GOOGLE TRADEMARK REGISTRATION on the grounds that it has become generic and/or descriptive of the services covered under Google Inc.'s trademark Registration. Google Inc., has retaliated by filing a Civil Rico Action Against Stoller's companies Central Mfg and Stealth Industries, Inc. Google Inc., did not name Stoller in the complaint which was filed on January 30, 2007 in Chicago, Illinois. Stoller has filed several Motion(s) to Interplead, Motion to Suspend Pending the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's (TTAB) Decision on Stollers Motion for Summary Judgment which is pending at the TTAB.
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that a District Court Proceeding such as Google Inc.,'s cannot be used to short-circuit established administrative procedures, such as those set up in the Patent and Trademark Office to determine the validity of federal trademark registration's. See Public Service Comm'n v. Wycoff Co., 344 U.S. 237, 97 I. Ed 291, 73 Ct 234 (1952) Stoller argues that Judge Kendall should suspend the Chicago District Court Litigation Pending TTAB's decision on Stoller's Motion for Summary Judgment.
Leo Stoller is a trademark Expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, surveys, damage reports, brief writing and appeal drafting for legal professionals. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com/
Thursday, February 01, 2007
TIME IS RUNNING OUT FOR GOOGLE'S TRADEMARK REGISTRATION FOR THE MARK GOOGLE
WASHINGTON--TIME IS RUNNING OUT FOR GOOGLE INC'S TRADEMARK REGISTRATION FOR THE MARK GOOGLE. Leo Stoller filed a petition to cancel the Google Inc., trademark on the gounds that the term 'google' has become "generic" and/or "descriptive" of the services covered under its Federal Trademark Registration. "Google" has become a genericized trademark (or genericized trade mark), known as a generic trade mark, generic descriptor or proprietary eponym, Google is a trademark or brand name which is often used as the colloquial description for a particular type of product or service as a result of widespread popular or cultural usage for search engines. Google has become a genericized trademark because the meaning of which now is the common term for doing a "internet" search. Google has become generic. Escalator and Thomas Edison's mimeograph are classic examples of other trademarks that have become generic. In the UK the term hoover has long been colloquially synonymous with vacuum cleaner, owing to The Hoover Company's dominance of the UK vacuum cleaner market in the first half of the 20th century. The Trademark Google has met the one risk factor standard, which lead to "genericide" the trademark 'google' is used as a verb, or a noun, plural or possessive, and the term 'google' is in the dictionary. Which is the death nill for a trademark Registration. See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google
Google Inc., has about 15 days left to file a formal response to Stoller pending motion for summary judgment at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board since Judge Jack B. Schmetterer entered an Order in Case NO. 05-64075 on January 18, 2007 lifting the "stay" and ordering Google to finally file its response with the Board. As of January 31, 2007 Google Inc., has filed nothing and will probably accept a default because there is "no valid defense" to the fact that the mark "google" has become "generic" and/or "descriptive" and will be canceled. Leo Stoller is a trademark expert who provides expert witness testimony, trademark valuations, trademark services to legal professionals, brief writing. Contact Stoller at ldms4@hotmail.com
